Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • Warranties & Ownership Overview


    In submitting a manuscript to JMDE, authors assert that the submitted manuscript, including all text, attachments, tables, charts, pictures, and other material, is the original work of the author(s) and, if applicable, that the author has obtained written permission to reproduce all previously published work. JMDE is not responsible for obtaining copyright permission for work submitted that is not from the original author submitting the manuscript, nor can it be held liable for copyright infringement.


    As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines may be returned to authors.


    When submitting a manuscript, the submitting author will be asked to warrant that the following are true:

  • 1. You are the author, or the authorized agent of the author(s) and copyright holder (if different from the author(s));
  • 2. the author(s) has approved the work for publication;
  • 3. the author(s) has agreed to submit the Article to the Journal;
  • 4. the author(s) agrees to grant the Journal a perpetual, non-exclusive worldwide license to the Article allowing for the reproduction, distribution, display, and performance of the work, and for reasonable generation of derivative works (e.g., translations, abstracts, and changes in file type/format for accessibility);
  • 5. the author(s) understands that the Journal will share the Article under a Creative Commons License allowing others to use and share the article according to the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/);
  • 6. The author(s) accept full responsibility for the content of the Article;

  • 7. the author(s) certify that the manuscript is original material, except for material from copyrighted sources and reproduced with the written permission of the copyright holder, and is in no way a violation of, or an infringement upon, any copyright belonging to any third party.
  • 8. The author(s) assert that the materials contained in the manuscript are accurate;
  • 9. the author(s) assert that the manuscript contains no defamatory or otherwise illegal materials;
  • 10. the author(s) assert that aspects of Indigenous cultural heritage have been appropriately identified and attributed (For more information on this practice, please visit Local Contexts at https://localcontexts.org/);
  • 11. the author(s) attest that all competing interests (conflicts of interest) of all authors have been disclosed to the editors of the Journal in the Comments to the Editor section;
  • 12. the author(s) attest that the source(s) of funding for the research is disclosed in the manuscript.
  • 13. The author(s) indemnify and hold the Journal safe from any claims that the manuscript infringes a third party’s copyright, the privacy of others, or contains inaccurate, libelous, or unlawful material.

  • 14. The author(s) declare that the submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in the Comments to the Editor section below) and that the manuscript will not be submitted to another journal while under consideration at JMDE.

Author Guidelines

Who Can Submit?

Anyone may submit an original article to be considered for publication in Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE), given the author(s) owns the copyright to the work being submitted or is authorized by the copyright owner or owners to submit the article. Authors are the initial owners of the copyrights to their works (exceptions include cases in which authors have, as a condition of employment, agreed to transfer copyright to their employer).

 

General Submission Rules

JMDE charges no article processing or submission fees.

Submitted articles cannot have been previously published, nor be forthcoming in an archival journal or book (print or electronic). In addition, by submitting material to JMDE, the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that they will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at JMDE. Read more about the submission process here. If you have concerns about the journal’s submission terms, please contact the editors.

 

Submission Process

All manuscripts must be submitted as Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect files through JMDE’s submission portal. See formatting requirements below for more detail. 

Once submitted, each manuscript is assigned to and reviewed by the appropriate section editor. If deemed fit for JMDE, manuscripts submitted as Research Articles, Case Studies, and Teaching Evaluation articles undergo a double-anonymous peer-review process. Reviewers with relevant expertise and experience and a diversity of backgrounds are selected to review each manuscript. Authors may recommend reviewers, assuming they do not have any direct conflicts of interest. Manuscripts submitted for the Ideas to Consider or Reviews sections undergo review by the associated section editor. JMDE is not under any obligation to publish any submission. 

Once accepted for publication, each manuscript will be copyedited, and the author(s) will be asked to approve a final proof before publication. A summary of the process from submission to publication is below. Please note, all notices and communications from JMDE will be sent to the submitting author at the email address associated with their submission.

Peer Review: Ensuring an Anonymous Review - Instructions for Authors

Manuscripts submitted to the peer-reviewed sections of JMDE (Research Articles, Case Studies, and Teaching Evaluation articles) must not reveal the author(s), their affiliation(s), or any other potentially identifying information. If manuscripts contain any identifying information when they are submitted, they must be corrected before they can be sent out for review. This slows down the reviewing process. To avoid delays, please follow these guidelines:

  • Remove all mentions of author name(s), institutional affiliations(s), and sources of funding from the paper (including page headers and footers, footnotes, and acknowledgments).
  • Please avoid phrasing in which you refer to your own previously published work (for example, “Elsewhere I have argued…”). If possible, refer to your own references in the third person. Avoid citing unpublished manuscripts.
  • Check that all identifiers have been removed from electronic files such as Microsoft Word documents (File → Information → Check for issues → Inspect Document).

Please note that inadequately anonymized manuscripts will be returned to authors for further anonymizing.

 

Formatting Requirements for Submissions

All manuscripts submitted to JMDE should be double-spaced and follow the style recommendations of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.; click here for APA style resources).

  1. Type Style
    • Use Times New Roman font for all text.
    • Use 12-point type for all text.
  2. Margins and Tabs
    • Use 1.00-inch margins on all sides.
    • Do not reset the default tab settings.
  3. Line and Paragraph Spacing
    • Use double-spacing throughout the entire manuscript, except within tables, table notes, and footnotes, which should be single-spaced.
    • Do not add an extra line/space between paragraphs.
    • Do not reset the default paragraph spacing settings (before and after each paragraph).
  4. Other Specifications
    • Use letter-size pages (8.5 x 11 inches) for all copy.
    • Use portrait-oriented pages for all text and tables.
    • Prepare all copy flush left; do not use full justification; use left justification only.
    • Use one space after periods and other punctuation.
    • Capitalize titles and headings headline-style; do not use all capital letters except in pre-defined acronyms.
    • Indent the first line of each paragraph using the tab.
    • Format any quotations of 40 words or longer as block quotes (indent the entire quotation).
    • Use your software’s (e.g., Word, Pages, Google Doc) “Tables” feature rather than using tabs or spacing to align data.
    • Use hard returns only at the ends of paragraphs or other places where lines of copy are broken (such as after each line in a heading or subheading).
    • Limit the use of numerical and/or bulleted lists.
    • Follow the most recent (currently 7th ed.) APA publication manual for in-text citations, tables, figures, and reference list entries.
    • Do not include a title page.
    • Include an abstract.
    • Do not include any identifying information. 
    • Do not include headers or footers. These, along with page numbers, will be added as part of our publication process.
    • Submit your manuscript, including tables, figures, appendices, etc., as a single file (Word and RTF are accepted).

 

Research Articles

Each research article is a scholarly contribution to the evaluation literature, derived from empirical or conceptual/theoretical research, which consists of original work involving research methods and findings from a fully investigated study⎯including, but not limited to, research on evaluation, systematic reviews, methodological techniques/tools, and framework-/theory- building initiatives. Articles are no longer than 5,000 words, excluding tables and references. 

Case Studies

Each case study is a detailed description of a unique evaluation that (a) showcases novel evaluation practice and (b) provides the necessary and relevant/pertinent documentation of the evaluation case (e.g., context, methodology, findings, and use) to inform future research on evaluation studies. Case studies are no longer than 7,500 words, excluding tables and references. 

Teaching Evaluation

Each Teaching Evaluation article is a detailed description of a unique teaching experience that contributes to the scholarship of teaching and learning in evaluation by showcasing a novel approach to or innovative materials which support teaching evaluation. Teaching Evaluation articles are no longer than 5,000 words, excluding tables and references.

Ideas to Consider

Brief, scholarly explorations of innovative ideas, which raise awareness of emerging concepts related to evaluation theory, policy, or practice. New, unpublished data should not be presented. Ideas to consider are no longer than 2,500 words, excluding tables and references. 

Reviews

Scholarly reflections on evaluation books, conferences, or journals that highlight recent developments or report on important topics to the field. New, unpublished data should not be presented. Reviews are no longer than 2,500 words, excluding tables and references.

Notes from the Global Field

This new section will provide a space for practitioners in the field to share some of their “lessons learned” and “strategic tips” on how to evaluate humanitarian responses more effectively in the future. Far from being an outlet aimed only at “humanitarian evaluation specialists”, this new section will provide scholars with critical inputs on new practices, ideas and trends in humanitarian evaluation and practice that ought to be explored and assessed further in future research.

The length of each submission, subject to single review by the section editor, will be up to 1,000 words.

In Memoriam

This section is reserved for memorials for individuals who have made significant contributions to the evaluation field. 

Journal Reviews

Journal reviews are not peer-reviewed but are reviewed by the section editor. They are no longer than 10 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

Conference Reviews

Conference reviews are not peer-reviewed but are reviewed by the section editor. They are no longer than 10 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

Tools and Methods

Tools and methods pieces may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the section editor. They are no longer than 20 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

Global Evaluation News

Global evaluation news pieces are not peer-reviewed but are reviewed by the section editor. They are no longer than 10 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

New Developments

New developments pieces are not peer-reviewed but are reviewed by the section editor. They are no longer than 10 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

Research Note

A research note is a concise but complete description of a limited investigation that will not be included in a later manuscript. It serves to either (1) present initial proof-of-concept results on new ideas or program evaluations, timely issues, or innovative approaches; or (2) report a replication or extension of previously published research, contributing to a greater understanding of the phenomena under study but not meriting another full-length manuscript. Research notes are no longer than 10 double-spaced pages, excluding tables and references.

Evaluation Standards Scholarship

This section is for the management of the articles developed for the special issue and curated by the special issue editor Brad Watts.

International Evaluation Academy Special Issue 2022

This is the section for submissions to the International Evaluation Academy's 2022 Special Issue on Decolonization of Evaluation. Articles submitted to this section will be considered for inclusion in the issue. 

International Evaluator Competence Perspectives

Submissions will have ben reviewed and approved for submission by Sanjeev Sridharan.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.