Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation

Main Article Content

Brandon W. Youker

Abstract




Youker examines goal-free evaluation's history and importance, advocating for its broader acceptance in program evaluation practice.




Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Youker, B. W. (2024). Scriven’s Goal-Free Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 20(47), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v20i47.1005
Section
In Memoriam

References

Abboud, R., & Claussen, C. (2016). The use of Outcome Harvesting in learning-oriented and collaborative inquiry approaches to evaluation: An example from Calgary, Alberta. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.005

Chen, A. T. H., Koh, G. C.-H., Fong, N. P., Lim, J. F. Y., & Hildon, Z. J.-L. (2023). Evaluating the effects of capacity building initiatives and primary care networks in Singapore: Outcome harvesting of system changes to chronic disease care delivery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032192

Dinh, K., Worth, H., & Haire, B. (2019). Buddhist evaluation: Applying a Buddhist world view to the Most Significant Change Technique. Evaluation, 25(4), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019841654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019841654

Fink Shapiro, L., Hoey, L., & Colasanti, K. (2021). Stories as indicators: Lessons learned using the Most Significant Change method to evaluate food systems work in Michigan. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.102.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.102.025

Henry, E., Walker, M. R., Noble, C. C., Fernandez, C. S. P., Corbie-Smith, G., & Dave, G. (2022). Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 94, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141

House, E. (1974). Confessions of a responsive goal-free evaluator [Unpublished manuscript]. Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Miller R. L., King, J. A., Mark, M. M., & Stockdill, S. H. (2005). The oral history of evaluation, part 3. The American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005276646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005276646

Railer, J., Stockley, D., Flynn, L., Hastings‐Truelove, A., & Hussain, A. (2020). Using outcome harvesting: Assessing the efficacy of CBME implementation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(4), 1132–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13359

Russell, J. (2023, January 30). More big donors want to be anonymous. Indianapolis Business Journal. https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/articles/more-big-donors-want-to-be-anonymous

Scriven, M. (1972). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1174432

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage.

Vedung, E. (1997/2017). Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127767

Youker, B. W. (2013). Goal-free evaluation: A potential model for the evaluation of social work programs. Social Work Research, 37(4), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svt032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svt032

Youker, B. W. (2019). What, how, and why? A comparative analysis of 12 goal-free evaluations. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 15(33), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444

Youker, B. W., Ford, K., & Bayer, N. (2017). Dismissing the goals: A comparison of four goal-dismissive goal-free evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 46, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.007