What Is This Thing Called Evaluation Theory?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v20i48.1037

Keywords:

evaluation theory, data visualization, research on evaluation, teaching evaluation

Abstract

Background: Evaluation theory has and continues to play an important role in the practice and profession of evaluation. Over the years, and as the range of evaluation theories has continued to grow, evaluation scholars and practitioners have developed various visualized classification frameworks of evaluation theory, invoking images such as trees, rivers, the periodic table, metro maps, concept maps, and most recently gardens.

Purpose: The purpose of this special issue is to explore different visualizations of evaluation theory and to discuss their benefits and implications for the practice and profession of evaluation.

Setting: Not applicable.

Intervention: Not applicable. 

Research Design: Not applicable. 

Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.

Findings: Not applicable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, A. D., & Abbott, D. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. W.W. Norton & Company.

Alkin, M. C. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157

Alkin, M. C. (2013). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists’ views and influences. Sage Publications.

Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2023). Evaluation roots: Theory influencing practice. Sage Publications.

Alkin, M., & Ellett, F. (1985). Evaluation models and their development. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies. Pergamon Press.

Alkin, M. C., & House, E. (1992). Evaluation of programs. In M. C. Alkin (ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research. Macmillan.

American Evaluation Association. (2018). AEA evaluator competencies. https://www.eval.org/About/Competencies-Standards/AEA-Evaluator-Competencies

Azzam, T., & Donaldson, S. I. (2012). The evaluation purposes visualization. Unpublished manuscript.

Azzam, T., & Donaldson, S. I. (2013). The evaluation purposes visualization. Unpublished manuscript.

Bledsoe, K. L., & Graham, J. A. (2005). The use of multiple evaluation approaches in program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278749

Boyce, A. S., & McGowan, B. L. (2019). An exploration of two novice evaluation educators’ experiences developing and implementing introduction to evaluation courses. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018778812

Christie, C. A. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 97(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.72

Christie, C. A., & Alkin, M. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 12–66). Sage Publications.

Christie, C. A., & Lemire, S. T. (2019). Why evaluation theory should be used to inform evaluation policy. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(4), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018824045

Coryn, C. L., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010389321

Dewey, J. D., Montrosse, B. E., Schröter, D. C., Sullins, C. D., & Mattox, J. R. (2008). Evaluator competencies: What’s taught versus what’s sought. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(3), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008321152

Donaldson, S. I., & Lipsey, M. W. (2006). Roles for theory in evaluation practice. In I. Shaw, J.

Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of Evaluation (pp.56–75). Sage Publications.

European Evaluation Society. (2011). The EES evaluation capabilities framework. https://europeanevaluation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-EES-Evaluation-Capabilities-Framework-leaflet.pdf

Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Steps of empowerment evaluation: From California to Cape Town. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)90010-8

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Wingate, L. A. (2023). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Galport, N., & Azzam, T. (2017). Evaluator Training Needs and Competencies: A Gap Analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016643183

Glass, G. V., & Ellett, F. S. (1980). Evaluation research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001235

House, E. R. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Educational Researcher, 7(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X007003004

Lee, J., LeBaron Wallace, T., & Alkin, M. (2007). Using problem-based learning to train evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(4), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007305613

Lemire, S. (2020). The evaluation metro map. Unpublished manuscript.

Lemire, S., Peck, L. R., & Porowski, A. (2020). The growth of the evaluation tree in the policy analysis forest: Recent developments in evaluation. Policy Studies Journal, 48(S1), S47–S70. https://doi.org/10/ghdjc2

Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. The Guilford Press.

Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice. Guilford Publications.

Montrosse-Moorhead, B., Gambino, A. J., Yahn, L. M., Fan, M., & Vo, A. T. (2022). Evaluator education curriculum: Which competencies ought to be prioritized in Master’s and Doctoral programs? American Journal of Evaluation, 43(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211020326

Montrosse-Moorhead, B., Schröter, D., & Becho, L. W. (2024). The garden of evaluation approaches. American Journal of Evaluation, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140231216667

Moss, P. A., & Haertel, E. H. (2016). Engaging methodological pluralism. Handbook of research on teaching, 5, 127–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_3

Oxford University Press (2023a, September). Theory (n., sense 3). In Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1108604610.

Oxford University Press (2023b, December). Approach (n., sense 5b). In Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3442162913.

Oxford University Press (2023c, December). Model (n., sense II.10). In Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3160470348.

Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage Publications.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage Publications.

Popham, W. J. (1975). Educational evaluation. Hall Press.

Quadrant Conseil, Strategic Design Scenarios (2022). Impact Evaluation. A map of uses. Agence française de développement. https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2023-01-04-20-43/impact-evaluation-map-uses.pdf

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Scriven, M., & Davidson, E. J. (2021, November 12). The transscientific theory of evaluation [Paper presentation]. American Evaluation Association Annual Conference. https://evaluation.secure-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/1/schedule/items/1242

Shadish, W. R. (1998). Evaluation theory is who we are. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409801900102

Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage Publications.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

UK Evaluation Society. (2012). Framework of evaluation capabilities. https://www.evaluation.org.uk/app/uploads/2019/04/UK-Evaluation-Society-Framework-of-Evaluation-Capabilities.pdf

United Nations Evaluation Group. (2016). UNEG evaluation competency framework. https://www.unevaluation.org/document/download/2610

UNEG Working Group on Evaluation Methods. (2020). Compendium of evaluation methods reviewed (Vol. 1). United Nations Evaluation Group. http://www.unevaluation.org/document/detail/2939

Vaca, S. (2017). Periodic table of evaluation. Retrieved November 22, 2017, from https://twitter.com/VisualBrains/status/933239046658187265

Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: developing program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33, 77–92. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1447

Worthen, B. W., & Sanders, J. R. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. C. A. Jones Publishing Company.

cover page

Downloads

Published

16-Aug-24

How to Cite

Lemire, S., Montrosse-Moorhead, B., & Christie, C. (2024). What Is This Thing Called Evaluation Theory?. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 20(48), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v20i48.1037

Issue

Section

Special Issue on Visualizing Evaluation Theory