Conclusions on the Way Forward for Evaluation in Difficult Times

Main Article Content

Richard Boyle
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5645-6324
Drew Koleros
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-4589
Rob D. van den Berg
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-0558

Abstract

Background: The evaluation profession faces unprecedented challenges in an era of global uncertainty, with shifting political climates, rising populism, and complex societal problems requiring innovative evaluation approaches. Moments like these are opportune times to harvest learnings from the past to inform current and future evaluation practice.


Purpose: This concluding chapter reflects on Ray Rist's career and the broader implications of INTEVAL's work for the future of evaluation in uncertain times, highlighting key characteristics that can guide evaluators navigating contemporary challenges.


Setting: The article examines Ray Rist's influence across academic, governmental, and international institutions, including his work with INTEVAL, the General Accounting Office, the World Bank, IPDET, and IDEAS.


Intervention: Not applicable.


Research Design: Not applicable.


Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.


Findings: Four key characteristics define Ray Rist's approach. These characteristics guided his approach to INTEVAL over the past 40 years and remain relevant for evaluators today: (1) commitment to continuous professional development and lifelong learning; (2) dedication to addressing injustice through evaluation and audit; (3) focus on institutionalizing evaluation capacity globally, particularly in the Global South; and (4) emphasis on open collaboration and inclusive discussion. These characteristics have enabled INTEVAL to remain relevant despite changing times and can guide evaluators facing current global challenges including climate change, migration, and increasing populism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Boyle, R., Koleros, D., & van den Berg, R. D. (2025). Conclusions on the Way Forward for Evaluation in Difficult Times. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 21(50), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v21i50.1203
Section
Linking Evaluation Theory to Practice: Enduring Contributions of Ray C. Rist

References

Eliadis, Pearl, Naidoo, Indran A. & Rist, Ray C. (eds.) (2023). Policy evaluation in the era of Covid-19. New York, Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376316

Rist, Ray C., Marie-Helene Boily and Frederick Martin (eds.) (2011). Influencing change: building evaluation capacity to strengthen governance. Herndon, World Bank Publications https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8403-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8403-9

Rist, Ray C. Rist, Marie-Helene Boily and Frederic R. Martin (eds.) (2013) Development evaluation in times of turbulence: dealing with crises that endanger our future. Washington, DC, World Bank Group https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9879-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9879-1

Rist, Ray C., Frederic R. Martin and Ana Maria Fernandez (eds.) (2016) Poverty, inequality, and evaluation: changing perspectives. Washington DC, World Bank Group https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0703-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0703-9

Stame, Nicoletta & Rist, Ray C. (eds.) (2006). From studies to streams: Managing evaluative systems. New York, Routledge