What Do All These Numbers Mean? Data Visualization as an Innovative Methodology to Make Program Decisions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of consistent, comprehensible data collection and analysis methods for evaluating teacher preparation program’s coverage of required standards for accreditation. Of particular concern is the adequate coverage of standards and competencies that address the teaching of English learners and teachers of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.
Purpose: To graphically convey the findings of a faculty survey regarding English learner and multicultural content in teacher preparation coursework in order to inform them of inadequate coverage (and saturation) of those particular teaching standards and competencies.
Setting: A small teacher preparation program in a Northern California public university that prepares elementary school teachers and special education teachers.
Intervention: 10 full and part-time faculty members in a teacher preparation program that prepares elementary and special education teachers.
Research Design: Congruency study, in which raw data from faculty survey responses were compared with rated program responses to teacher preparation standards by means of a relational database with graphing output capabilities.
Data Collection: A survey instrument was designedandadministeredtoallfacultymembers in the program.
Findings: The resulting radar maps and other graphic outputs allowed faculty to clearly see where their course content aligned with the program accreditation response and where more coverage of that particular competency was necessary.
Conclusions: The use of relational databases was a highly effective method for helping one teacher preparation program to visualize their progress towards meeting standards for teacher preparation in the area of student diversity and the teaching of English learners.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Blank, R. K. (2007). Alignment content analysis of NAEP 2007 Mathematics Assessment using the Surveys of Enacted Curriculum methodology. Washington, DC: The Chief Council of State School Officers (CCSO).
California Department of Education (2007). Closing the academic achievement gap. Retrieved November 2, 2009 from http://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/pc/yr07guidgprin.asp.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (1996). Standards of quality and effectiveness for education specialist credential programs (including university internship options) and clinical rehabilitative services credential programs. Sacramento, CA: State of California.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (2001). Standards of quality and effectiveness for teacher preparation programs for preliminary multiple and single subject teaching credentials (Revised 2008). Sacramento, CA: State of California.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (2006). Coded Correspondence No. 06-0009: English learner authorizations added for the education specialist credentials. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (2009). SB 2042 Multiple subject and single subject preliminary credential program standards. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
California Department of Education (2009). English learners in California Schools, 2008-09. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education, Educational Demographics Office (language census, 8/19/09).
California Department of Education (2006). English learners in California: Frequently asked questions. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/
Clift, R. T. & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.) (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Gandara, P., & Rumberger, R. (2002). The inequitable treatment of English learners in California's public schools. Williams Watch Series: Investigating the claims of Williams v. State of California.
Gandara, P., Rumbergher, R., Maxwell- Jolly, J., & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n36.2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n36.2003
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (1998). Introduction: Reconceptualizing teaching practice. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 1-4). London: Falmer Press.
Hand, D. J., Blunt, G., Kelly, M. G., & Adams, N. M. (2000). Data mining for fun and profit. Statistical Science, 18(2), 111-131.
Harter, L. M., Japp, P. M., & Beck, C. (2005). Narratives, health, and healing. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613455
Hearst, M. (1999). User interfaces and visualization. In R. Baeza-Yates & B. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.), Modern information retrieval. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Hollins, E. R., & Torres Guzman, M. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: A report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108- 446, 108th Congress.
Kosnick, S., Beck, C., Freese, A. R., & Samaras, A. P. (Eds.). (2006). Making a differrence in teacher education through self study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3528-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3528-4
Marquez-Zenkov, K. (2005). "Urban" across institutions: Portfolio assessment at Cleveland State University. In F. P. Peterman (Ed.), Designing performance assessments for urban teacher preparation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Merino, B. J. (2007). Identifying critical competencies for teachers of English Learners. U.C. LMRI Newsletter, 16(4), 1-7.
Muradyan, A., Boldt, V., Steininger, A., Stabentheiner,S.T.,K.,Kreutzberger, J., Muller, I. (2008). An integrative approach for analyzing the interplay of genetic and epigenetic changes in tumors. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 132(10), 1557- 1561. https://doi.org/10.5858/2008-132-1557-AIAFAT DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/2008-132-1557-AIAFAT
NCATE. (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Washington, D.C.: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.
Passel, J. (2004). Mexican immigration to the US: The latest estimates. Retrieved December 20, 2009 from http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?ID=208
Selvester, P. M., Summers, D., & Williams, E. F. (2006). Costs and benefits of accountability: A case study of credential candidates' performance assessment. Issues in Teacher Education, 15(1), 21-36.
Singer, A., & Wilson, J. H. (2007). Refugee resettlement in metropolitan America. Retrieved December 20, 2009 from http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=585
Teno, J., & Banaschewski, T. (2002). Palliative care teams self-reflection- past, present, and future. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23(2), 94-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00394-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00394-3
Trent, S. C., Kea, C. D., & Oh, K. (2008). Preparing preservice educators for cultural diversity: How far have we come? Exceptional Children, 74(J), 328-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400304
Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Zeichner, K. M. (1992). Educating teachers for cultural diversity. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
Zeichner, K. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 34-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296219
Zhang, D., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Minority representation in special education: A persistent challenge. Remedial and Special Education, 23(3), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230030601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230030601