Exploring Design Thinking Practices in Evaluation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Design thinking is the process by which the core principles of design are used to problem solve and identify innovative solutions that enahance user experience.
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of design thinking and explore the basic principles of design thinking within the context of the evaluation.
Setting: The design thinking process has been used in various fields to enhance innovation and consumer experience. This article explores how the concepts of design thinking can enhance evaluation practice.
Intervention: This article did not require an intervention
Research Design: Not applicable
Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable
Findings: We present ideas for adopting design thinking principles into everyday evaluation practice
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15, 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.016527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.016527
Boland, R., & Collopy, F. (2004). Managing as designing (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Brooks, F. P. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley Professional.
Brown, T. (2008, June). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-95.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Clark, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Unleashing the power of design thinking. Design Management Review, 19, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2008.tb00123.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2008.tb00123.x
Davidson, E. J. (2013). Actionable evaluation basics: Getting succinct answers to the most important questions. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Hassi, L., & Laakso, M. (2011). Design thinking in the management discourse: Defining the elements of the concept. In 18th International Product Development Management Conference: Innovate Through Design, The Netherlands.
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design & Culture, 3, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues, 26(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15
Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., & Mattelmäki, T. (2003). Empathic design: User experience in product design. Helsinki: IT Press.
Kouprie, M., & Visser, S. F. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user's life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20, 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902875033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902875033
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2006). Principles of marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Norman, C. (2014, January 28). Developmental evaluation and design. Retrieved from http://censemaking.com/2014/01/28/developmental-evaluation-and-design
Norman, C. (2014, February 23). Cameron Norman on the evaluator as designer. Retrieved from http://aea365.org/blog/cameron-norman-on-the-evaluator-as-designer
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2012). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Suri, J. F., & Hendrix, R. M. (2010). Developing design sensibilities. Rotman Magazine, 59, 263.
Tran, R., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2013, September 6). Design thinking for evaluation and learning. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/design_thinking_for_evaluation_and_learning
Uehira, T., & Kay, C. (2009). Using design thinking to improve patient experiences in Japanese hospitals: A case study. The Journal of Business Strategy, 30, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942418
Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.2.314