Enhancing the Strategic Management Process Through the Use of Professional Evaluation Methods and the Logic of Evaluation

Main Article Content

Nadini Persaud
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1827-2867
Michelle Woodhouse
Michael Scriven

Abstract

Background: The evaluation discipline has the potential to enhance other disciplines by integrating evaluation specific methodologies and logic into processes within other disciplines and improving/strengthening the manner in which evaluation of processes, programs and policies are carried out.


Purpose: This paper will highlight the evaluative nature of one of the most popular strategic management models (SMM) in corporate America, namely, Fred David’s (2013) SMM, and examine how professional evaluation logic and methodology can be used to improve David's SMM.


Setting: NA


Intervention: NA


Research Design: The paper will make a comparative analysis between Michael Scriven's Key Evaluation Checklist (KEC) and David's SMM and highlight similarities and differences between the two models.


Data Collection and Analysis: NA


Findings: The paper will conclude by providing several suggestions to enhance and strengthen David's SMM to make it more robust, valuable, and useful in the business environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Persaud, N., Woodhouse, M., & Scriven, M. (2016). Enhancing the Strategic Management Process Through the Use of Professional Evaluation Methods and the Logic of Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 12(26), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v12i26.443
Section
Research on Evaluation Articles
Author Biographies

Nadini Persaud, The University of the West Indies

Lecturer in Project Evaluation

Program Coordinator, M.Sc. Project Management and Evaluation

Department of Management Studies

Michelle Woodhouse, Catawba College

Associate Professor of Business

Michael Scriven, Claremont Graduate University

Professor of Psychology

Co-Director of the Claremont Evaluation Center

References

Alkin, M.C. & Christie, C. A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 12-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: California: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157

Beaver, G. (2003). Management and the small firm. Strategic Change, 12, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.623

Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (2003). A model of entrepreneurial planning and its effect on performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 15(1).

David, F. R. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

David, F. R. (2013). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. (13th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

Ezigbo, C. A. (2012). Achieve organizational effectiveness by decentralisation. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(20).

Davidson, E. J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: California: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230115

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Gibbons, P. T. & O'Connor, T. (2005). Influences on strategic planning processes among Irish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(2), 170-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2005.00132.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2005.00132.x

Groom, J. & David, F. R. (1991). Competitive intelligence activity among small firms. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal 66(1), 47-53.

Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: California: Sage Publications.

O'Regan, N. & Ghobadian, A. (2002). Effective strategic planning in small and medium sized firms. Management Decision, 40(7), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210438490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210438490

Orser, B. J., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. L. (2000). Performance, firm size and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 42-58.

Mazzarol, T. W. (2005). A proposed framework for the strategic management of small entrepreneurial firms. Small Enterprise Research: The Journal of SEAANZ, 13(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.13.1.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.13.1.37

Normann, R. and Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 65-77.

Robinson, R. B. & Pearce, J. A. (1984). Research thrusts in small firm strategic planning. Academy of Management, 9(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4278109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4278109

Rumelt, R. P., Scheddel, D. E., & Teece, D.J. (1996). Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Scriven, M. (2003). Evaluation in the new millennium: The transdisciplinary vision. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.). Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 19-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlaum Associates, Inc.

Scriven, M. (2015). Key evaluation checklist. Retrieved from http://michaelscriven.info/

Situma, P. S. (2012). The effectiveness of trade shows and exhibitions as organizational marketing tool (Analysis of selected companies in Mombasa). International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(22), 219-230.

Stoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E. & Gilbert Jr., D. R. (1995). Management. (6th ed.). Indiac: Prentice-Hall.

Wagner, E. T. (2013, September 12) Five reasons 8 out of 10 businesses fail. Retrieved November 01, 2015 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwagner/2013/09/12/five-reasons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/

Wang, C., Walker, E. A., & Redmond, J. L. (2007). Explaining the lack of strategic planning in SMEs: The importance of owner motivation. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 12(1), 1-16

Waterman, R. (1987). The renewal factor: How the best get and keep the competitive edge. New York: Bantam.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>