The World of Evaluation: Challenges Faced by Student Evaluators
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Performing a high profile evaluation in a world-class organization is a daunting experience for any professional program evaluator. As a student evaluator, it is more than just formidable it has distinctive challenges. Fortunately, professional undertakings provide student evaluators with the experience and tools to overcome these early tests with continuing practice.
Purpose: This paper discusses the challenges that student evaluators face in performing their first program evaluation project. It will draw from the experience of one student’s first major evaluation project and current, but limited, research on the subject.
Setting: N/A
Intervention: NA
Research Design: This paper will examine the broad-spectrum of challenges that student evaluators experience in their first assignment referencing as a case study an actual evaluation of a hospital risk-assessment program implementation.
Data Collection and Analysis: Literature review and documented evaluator experiences.
Findings: This paper will conclude with a discussion of possible mitigation strategies to overcome these student evaluator challenges.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Brandon, P. R., & Fukunaga, L. L. (2014). The state of the empirical research literature on stakeholder involvement in program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013503699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013503699
Canadian Evaluation Society. (2014). Competencies for Canadian evaluators. Retrieved from http://evaluationcanada.ca/competencies-canadian-evaluators
Cottrell et al. (2015). Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2147/CER.S69605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CER.S69605
Darabi, A. (2002). Teaching program evaluation: Using a systems approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400202300211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(02)00171-6
Gredler, M. E., & Johnson, R. L. (2001). Lessons learned from the directed evaluation experience. The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00115-1
Levin-Rozalis, M. (2003) Evaluation and research: Differences and similarities. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 18(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.18.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.18.001
Lishner, K., & Puetz, B. (1986). Program evaluation: As the program director sees it; As the evaluator sees it. The Journal of Continuing Education, 17(4), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19860701-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19860701-07
Shannon, P., Kim, W., & Robinson, A. (2012). Implementing a service learning model for teaching research methods and program evaluation. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32, 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2012.680867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2012.680867
Weiss, C. H. (1988). If program decisions hinged only on information: A response to Patton. Evaluation Practice, 9(3), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821408800900302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80042-4