Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd ed.)
Main Article Content
Abstract
A review of the book Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd ed.) by Marvin C. Alkin and Anne T. Vo, published in 2018 by Guilford Press.
Downloads
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Alkin, M. C., & Vo, A. T. (2018). Evaluation essentials from A to Z (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Bamberger, M., Tarsilla, M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2016). Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute. Evaluation and Program Planning, 55, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001
Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation, 74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255 Mathison, S. (2007). What is the difference between research and evaluation-and why do we care? In N. L. Smith & P. R. Brandon (Eds.). Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 183-196). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
Mertens, D. M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 138, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20053