Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd ed.)

Main Article Content

Andrea L Swintal

Abstract

A review of the book Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd ed.) by Marvin C. Alkin and Anne T. Vo, published in 2018 by Guilford Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Swintal, A. L. (2018). Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd ed.). Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 14(31), 55–57. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v14i31.510
Section
Reviews

References

Alkin, M. C., & Vo, A. T. (2018). Evaluation essentials from A to Z (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Bamberger, M., Tarsilla, M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2016). Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute. Evaluation and Program Planning, 55, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001

Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation, 74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1069

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255 Mathison, S. (2007). What is the difference between research and evaluation-and why do we care? In N. L. Smith & P. R. Brandon (Eds.). Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 183-196). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

Mertens, D. M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 138, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20053