Opportunities and Challenges to Increase Inter- and Transdisciplinarity: A Qualitative Study of the FloodRISE Project
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The FloodRISE project, which started in 2013 in Southern California, aimed at better understanding how to promote resilience to coastal flooding. It was based on a cross-disciplinary approach, involving several research teams and local communities.
Purpose: We conducted a qualitative study of the first phase of the project (2013-2015) in order to analyze its inter- and transdisciplinary aspects.
Setting: We conducted this evaluation as a visiting postdoctoral researcher at UCI, not participating in the FloodRISE project.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research design: We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with members of the three project teams - modeling, social ecology and integration & impact - at UCI in 2015. Data were analyzed and interpreted to identify key aspects of the collaboration within and between project teams, as well as their relationship to local stakeholders.
Findings: The analysis showed that an intensive dialogue-based method of interaction and the presence of boundary researchers played a fundamental role in bridging the conceptual and methodological gaps between social and engineering sciences. These results thus exemplify several possibilities for developing more efficient interactions between researchers in a cross-disciplinary project. However, any cross-disciplinary project should: carefully evaluate potential for participants to become boundary researchers, since participants with multiple disciplinary expertise may be underemployed; improve researchers’ level of readiness, in order to facilitate further interaction and increase time efficiency; and clearly address remoteness issues to avoid lower collaboration between central and peripheral locations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Barry, A. and G. Born, Eds. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. Abingdon, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203584279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203584279
Boyd, D., et al. (2015). "Prompting transdisciplinary research: Promising futures for using the performance metaphor in research." Futures 65: 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.014
Defila, R., et al. (2006). Forschungsverbundmanagement. Handbuch für die Gestaltung inter- und transdisziplinärer Projekte. Zürich, Vdf Hochschulverlag.
Eigenbrode, S. D., et al. (2007). "Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science." Bioscience 57(1): 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/B570109
Evely, A. C., et al. (2010). "Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research." Environmental Conservation 37(4): 442-450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000792
Gethmann, C. F., et al. (2015). Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims. Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
Griggs, G. B. (2010). The Effects of Armoring Shorelines-The California Experience. Puget Sound Shorelines and the Impacts of Armoring - Proceedings of a State of the Science Workshop, May 2009. H. Shipman, M. N. Dethier, G. Gelfenbaum, K. L. Fresh and R. S. Dinicola. Reston, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
Hadorn, G. H., et al. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein and C. Mitcham. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 431-452.
Huutoniemi, K. (2010). Evaluating interdisciplinary research. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. R. Frodeman. New York, Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. T. (2004). "Prospects for transdisciplinarity." Futures 36(4): 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
Klein, J. T. (2014). Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research. Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research. M. O. O'Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode and J. D. Wulfhorst. Los Angeles, Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483352947.n2
König, B., et al. (2013). "A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management." Research Policy 42: 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006
Lawrence, R. J. (2010). "Deciphering Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Contributions." Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1(1): 125-130. https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0003
Lawrence, R. J. (2015). "Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes." Futures 65: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007
Lawrence, R. J. (2017). Future directions: a trans-anthropo-logic of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinary Research and Practice for Sustainability Outcomes. D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy and C. Mitchell. New York, Routledge: 253-259.
Lyall, C., et al. (2011). Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity. New York, Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849661782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849661782
Lyall, C. and L. R. Meagher (2012). "A Masterclass in interdisciplinarity: Resear into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers." Futures 44(6): 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
National Academy of Sciences (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D.C., The National Academies Press.
O'Rourke, M. O., et al. (2014). Introduction. Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research. M. O. O'Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode and J. D. Wulfhorst. Los Angeles, Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139095105.001
Pohl, C. and G. H. Hadorn (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Munich, Oekom. https://doi.org/10.14512/9783962388638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/9783962388638
Ramadier, T. (2004). "Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies." Futures 36(4): 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009
Repko, A. F. (2014). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Los Angeles, Sage.
Stokols, D., et al. (2003). "Evaluating transdisciplinary science." Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5(Supplement 1): 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555
Stokols, D., et al. (2010). Cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: Research, training, and translation. Oxford Handbook on Interdisciplinarity. R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein and C. Mitcham. New York, Oxford University Press: 471-493.
Stokols, D., et al. (2008). "The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(2S): 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
Stokols, D., et al. (2005). "In Vivo Studies of Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28(2S2): 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016
Tobi, H. and J. K. Kampen (2018). "Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework." Quality & Quantity 52: 1209-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8