The Birth and Adaptation of Evaluation Theories
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Evaluation theories as we know them are prescriptions by prominent evaluators about what they believe to be an appropriate way to conduct evaluations. How do these prescriptions come about? In this paper we examine the various influences on the creation and subsequent modification of these prescribed evaluation theories. Inquiry into evaluation theories has a long history. What is new is inquiry into the evolution of theories.This makes theory formulation dynamic rather than static. Influences identified by Alkin in a National Society for the Study of Education yearbook (1989) serve as an initial guide to this inquiry. An examination of Michael Q. Patton's writings and shaping experiences provides further case study insights about the evolution of his utilization-focused evaluation theory and its offshoots.
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to gain further understanding about the way in which evaluation theories are developed, evolve, and take new directions, and the influences that shape the theorists' understandings and prescriptions.
Setting: Interview discussion with Michael Q. Patton and synthesis of interview data.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research design: Not applicable.
Data collection & analysis: Not applicable.
Findings: Factors that have influenced Michael Q. Patton’s initial theory development as well as subsequent modifications, adaptations, and offshoots offer insights into the connection between personal history and professional perspective. Specifically, these factors were: early personal experiences, professional training, interaction with professional colleagues, field evaluation experiences, interaction with non-evaluation academic colleagues and research conducted by Patton.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Alkin, M. (1990) Debates in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2005). Theorists' models in action. New Directions for Evaluation, 106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.155
Alkin, M., & Ellett, F. (1979). An inquiry into the nature of evaluation theorizing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 5, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(79)90022-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(79)90022-1
Alkin, M., & Ellett, F. (1985). Evaluation models and their development. In T. Husèn & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Vol. 3, pp. 1760-1766). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Alkin, M., & House, E. (1992). Evaluation of programs. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Alkin, M., (1989) Evaluation theory development II. In M. McLaughlin & D. Phillips (Eds.) Evaluation at quarter century (90th Yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Christie, C. (2003). The practice-theory relationship in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.72
Christie, C. & Alkin, M. (in press). New Directions for Evaluation.
Glass, G., & Ellett, F., Jr. (1980). Evaluation research. Annual Review Psychology, 31, 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001235
House, E. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Educational Researcher, 8, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X007003004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X007003004
Mark, M. (2008). Building a better evidence base for evaluation theory: Beyond general calls to a framework of types of research on evaluation. In N. Smith & P. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 111-133). New York, NY: Guilford.
Patton, M. Q. (2008) Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2010) Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford.
Patton, M. Q. (2016). From evangelist to utilization-focused evaluator. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Seven North American evaluation pioneers. New Directions for Evaluation, 150, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20191
Patton, M. Q., & Campbell-Patton, C. (2017). Principles-focused Evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20260
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1973). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj74xx DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj74xx
Popham, W. (1975). Educational evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Leviton, L. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Oral History Project Team. (2007). The oral history of evaluation, Part 5: An interview with Michael Quinn Patton. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006298129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006298129
Westley, F., Patton, M. Q., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
Williams, D. D. (2016). Connections, themes, and implications for the future of evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 150, 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20193
Williams, J. (1988). A numerically developed taxonomy of evaluation theory and practice. Evaluation Review, 13(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300102
Worthen, B., & Sanders, J. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones.