Theories of Change for Complex Sustainability Transformations: Mobilizing the Potential of Redefining the Relationship Between Humans and Nature
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Central to transformations towards sustainability is the call to redefine the relationship between humans and nature. This redefinition represents a paradigm shift, with many asserting that it holds the greatest potential for transformation. However, the practical implementation of this call often remains abstract for those responsible for interventions in sustainability, such as projects and programs. This paper aims to initiate the translation of this call into actionable steps for the design of Theories of Change. It will achieve this by bringing three approaches into dialogue: Principles-focused, Complexity-aware, and Decolonization approaches.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
Funding data
-
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Grant numbers 2021-00943
References
Arensman, B., Van Waegeningh, C., & Van Wessel, M. (2018). Twinning “Practices of Change” With “Theory of Change”: Room for Emergence in Advocacy Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017727364
Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bennett, E. M., & Reyers, B. (2024). Disentangling the complexity of human–nature interactions. People and Nature, 6(2), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10611
Böhme, J., Walsh, Z., & Wamsler, C. (2022). Sustainable lifestyles: Towards a relational approach. Sustainability Science, 17(5), 2063–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01117-y
Garcia-Arias, J., Tornel, C., & Flores Gutiérrez, M. (2024). Weaving a rhizomatic pluriverse: Allin kawsay , the Crianza Mutua Networks, and the Global Tapestry of Alternatives. Globalizations, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2352942
Gould, R. K., Martinez, D. E., & Hoelting, K. R. (2023). Exploring Indigenous relationality to inform the relational turn in sustainability science. Ecosystems and People, 19(1), 2229452. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2229452
Grove, K., & Pugh, J. (2018). Adaptation Machines, or the Biopolitics of Adaptation. In J. Bohland, S. Davoudi, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), The Resilience Machine (1st ed., pp. 110–124). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351211185-8
Hertz, A., Masako Goossens-Ishii, A., & Koh, N. S. (2023). Adopting a human rights-based approach to biodiversity and climate action [Discussion Paper, SwedBio]. https://swed.bio/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Adopting-a-Human-Rights-based-Approach-to-Biodiversity-and-Climate-Action_layouted_161023_FINAL.pdf
Hertz, T. (2022). Between Radical and Realistic: Biodiversity, Transformation and Development Cooperation (The Expert Group for Aid Studies - Sweden). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33795.37928
Hertz, T., Brattander, E., & Rose, L. (2021). Complexity-Aware Monitoring and Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 17(41), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v17i41.679
Hertz, T., & Mancilla Garcia, M. (2021). The Cod and the Cut: Intra-Active Intuitions. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 724751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.724751
Hertz, T., Mancilla Garcia, M., & Schlüter, M. (2020). From nouns to verbs: How process ontologies enhance our understanding of social‐ecological systems understood as complex adaptive systems. People and Nature, 2(2), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10079
IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3831673
Iwaniec, D. M., Cook, E. M., Barbosa, O., & Grimm, N. B. (2019). The Framing of Urban Sustainability Transformations. Sustainability, 11(3), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030573
Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462
Latour, B. (1994). We have never been modern (3. print.). Harvard Univ. Press. (Original work published 1991)
Linnér, B.-O., & Wibeck, V. (2020). Conceptualising variations in societal transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy, 106, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.007
Mancilla Garcia, M., Hertz, T., & Schlüter, M. (2020). Towards a Process Epistemology for the Analysis of Social-Ecological System. Environmental Values, 29(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15579936382608
Mancilla García, M., Hertz, T., Schlüter, M., Preiser, R., & Woermann, M. (2020). Adopting process-relational perspectives to tackle the challenges of social-ecological systems research. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11425-250129
Mason, P., & Barnes, M. (2007). Constructing Theories of Change: Methods and Sources. Evaluation, 13(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007075221
Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute. https://1a0c26.p3cdn2.secureserver.net/wp-content/userfiles/Leverage_Points.pdf
Oberlack, C., Breu, T., Giger, M., Harari, N., Herweg, K., Mathez-Stiefel, S.-L., Messerli, P., Moser, S., Ott, C., Providoli, I., Tribaldos, T., Zimmermann, A., & Schneider, F. (2019). Theories of change in sustainability science: Understanding how change happens. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.2.8
O’Brien, K. (2018). Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010
O’Brien, K., & Sygna, L. (2013). Responding to Climate Change: The Three Spheres of Transformation in Proceedings transformation in a changing climate: International Conference in Oslo 19-21 June 2013. University of Oslo.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Principles-focused evaluation: The guide. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (Director). (2023). Guide to Principles Focused Evaluation [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9Z7TQm8UMU
Preiser, R., Biggs, R., Hamann, M., Sitas, N., Selomane, O., Waddell, J., Clements, H., & Hichert, T. (2021). Co‐exploring relational heuristics for sustainability transitions towards more resilient and just Anthropocene futures. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(5), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2815
Sonetti-González, T., Mancilla García, M., Tengö, M., Tourne, D. C. M., De Castro, F., & Futemma, C. R. T. (2023). Foregrounding Amazonian women through decolonial and process-relational perspectives for transdisciplinary transformation. Ecosystems and People, 19(1), 2260503. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2260503
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. (2023). UNITED NATIONS WORLD WATER DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2023: Partnerships and cooperation for water. UNITED NATIONS.
West, S., Haider, L. J., Hertz, T., Mancilla Garcia, M., & Moore, M.-L. (2024). Relational approaches to sustainability transformations: Walking together in a world of many worlds. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2370539. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2370539
West, S., Haider, L. J., Stålhammar, S., & Woroniecki, S. (2020). A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
Whitehead, A. N. (1919). The Concept of Nature—The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College November 1919. https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Whitehead/Whitehead_1920/White1_01.html
Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world: Lowell Lectures, 1925. The Macmillan company.