Rubrics Methodology in Detail: Helping Save The Children Turn Children's Experiences of Discrimination and Exclusion into Rich, Trackable Outcomes

Main Article Content

E. Jane Davidson
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3360-8241
Thomaz K. Chianca
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-9215
Nicole Dulieu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-3304
Anil Sigdel

Abstract

Background: Save the Children’s child sponsorship program (referred to as Sponsorship) supports children, their families and communities, and institutions in 20 countries to create social and behavior change together so that all children survive, learn, are protected, and live free from discrimination.


Purpose: To present a new rubrics-enhanced monitoring, evaluation, accountability, and learning (MEAL) system being developed with Save the Children’s Sponsorship Program. The system helps the organization track progress on key social change outcomes, especially less tangible outcomes, such as children’s experiences of inequality and discrimination.


Setting: Sponsorship’s work spans 20 countries around the world. It works through a 10-year program cycle, building community capacity to create social change that addresses the root causes of inequality and discrimination for a group of
children living in an impact area. The evaluation methodology showcased here was piloted in Zambia, the Philippines, and El Salvador.


Intervention: Not applicable.


Research Design: This paper presents some of the nuts and bolts of using rubrics to turn stories of change into rich, trackable outcomes, using one of the 12 rubrics developed for Sponsorship to illustrate the methodology.


Data Collection and Analysis: Focus group and interview protocols are used to gather stories and other documentation (such as health statistics and educational outcomes) from children, families, community members, educators, health care professionals, and local government officials. A detailed, step-by-step evidence interpretation guide shows how to synthesize these multiple sources of evidence and convert them into evaluative ratings using rubrics and guided evaluative reasoning.


Findings: Rubrics are a powerful tool for evaluating complex and nuanced outcomes, provided they are appropriately adapted for different contexts. For MEAL practitioners less familiar with rubrics methodology, detailed guidance and support are needed to help ensure that the framework is applied consistently across the system while also being contextually responsive. Based on Save the Children’s experience, several helpful strategies are presented for introducing rubrics into an existing M&E system: starting small and building momentum; opt-in piloting and gradual rollout; smart capacity building; providing more detailed guidance to evaluators and managers; getting buy-in to a specific measurement problem and solution rather than replacing the entire MEAL system; working with expert allies; and getting excited and innovative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Davidson, E. J., Chianca, T., Dulieu, N., & Sigdel, A. (2025). Rubrics Methodology in Detail: Helping Save The Children Turn Children’s Experiences of Discrimination and Exclusion into Rich, Trackable Outcomes. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 21(49), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v21i49.1047
Section
Stories from Evaluation Practice

References

Chianca, T. K., & Davidson, E. J. (2020). Retrospective impact evaluation: Save the Children's Sponsorship programming in Woliso impact area, Ethiopia (2002-2010). Save the Children Child Rights Resource Center. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/retrospective-impact-evaluation-save-childrens-sponsorship-programming-woliso-impact-area/

Chianca, T. K., & Davidson, E. J. (2021). Fashion for good: Independent evaluation. COMEA Relevant Evaluations, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://www.laudesfoundation.org/media/y4ydafsd/2021-02-19ffg-report-final.pdf

Chianca, T. K., Davidson, E. J., Dulieu, N., & Sigdel, A. (2024). Rubrics 11: A toolkit to address child discrimination and exclusion. Save the Children Child Rights Resource Center. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/rubrics-11-a-toolkit-to-address-child-discrimination-and-exclusion/

Chianca, T. K., Scriven, M., & Kern, R. (2009). A qualitative and quantitative approach to impact evaluations of international development interventions: The case of Heifer International in 20 countries, 2005-2009 [Presentation]. American Evaluation Association conference. https://comm.eval.org/viewdocument/a-qualitative-and-qu

Davidson, E. J. (n.d.). What are rubrics? Real Evaluation LLC. https://realevaluation.com/what-are-rubrics/

Davidson, E. J. (2004). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230115

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230115

Davidson, E. J. (2014a). Evaluation of the Hutt Valley's first teen road safety expo, June 2014. Real Evaluation, Auckland, New Zealand. https://www.safecommunities.org.nz/application/files/7614/4963/3978/Appendixes-_Safe_Hutt_Valley_reaccreditation.pdf

Davidson, E. J. (2014b). Evaluative reasoning (Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 4). UNICEF Office of Research.

Davidson, E. J. (2025, forthcoming). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation (2nd ed.). Sage.

Davidson, E. J., & Chianca, T. K. (2020). Retrospective impact evaluation: Save the Children's sponsorship programming in Woliso Impact Area, Ethiopia (2002-2010). Real Evaluation, Seattle, WA. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/retrospective-impact-evaluation-save-childrens-sponsorship-programming-woliso-impact-area/

Falk, E. (2021, June 27). Op-Ed: Why storytelling is an important tool for social change. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-06-27/stories-brain-science-memory-social-change

Gargani, J., & King, J. (2024). Principles and methods to advance value for money. Evaluation, 30(1), 50-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231221526

https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231221526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231221526

King, J., McKegg, K., Arau, A., Schiff, A., & Garcia Aisa, M. (2020). Social and economic impact assessment of mutation breeding in crops of the RCA Programme in Asia and the Pacific. International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/20/11/social-and-economic-impact-assessment-of-mutation-breeding-in-crops-of-the-rca-programme-in-asia-and-the-pacific.pdf

King, J., McKegg, K., Oakden, J., & Wehipeihana, N. (2013). Rubrics: A method for surfacing values and improving the credibility of evaluation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 9(21), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v9i21.374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v9i21.374

https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v9i21.374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v9i21.374

Laudes Foundation (n.d.). Measuring and learning with rubrics. https://www.laudesfoundation.org/how-we-work/measuring-with-rubrics/

McKegg, K. (2011). Knowing about rubrics is one thing … tips, tricks and traps. In E J. Davidson, N. Wehipeihana, K. McKegg, & P. Rogers (Eds.), The rubric revolution (pp 24-44) [Presentation at the Australasian Evaluation Society conference, Sydney, Australia]. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/rubric-revolution

New Zealand Qualifications Authority (2021). Guide to external evaluation and review - for tertiary education organisations. NZQA, Wellington, New Zealand. https://www2.nzqa.govt.nz/assets/Tertiary/External-evaluation-and-review/Guide-to-EER/eer-guidelines.pdf

Nunns, H., & Roorda, M. (2010). Final evaluation report of the Recognised Seasonal Employer Policy (2007-2009). New Zealand Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/merit-determination-rubrics

Oakden, J. (2013) Evaluation rubrics: How to ensure transparent and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence. BetterEvaluation, Melbourne, Australia. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/evaluation-rubrics-how-ensure-transparent-clear-assessment-respects-diverse-lines-evidence

Salm, M. (n.d.). Personal stories. Better Evaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/methods/personal-stories

Save the Children (n.d.-a). Where we work. https://www.savethechildren.net/where-we-work#

Save the Children (n.d.-b). Sponsorship programs. Save the Children Child Rights Resource Center. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/collection/sponsorship-programs/

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage.

Toll, E. (n.d.). Greetings and customs around the world. DiversityResources. https://www.diversityresources.com/greeting-customs-around-the-world/

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, November 20, 1989, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Wehipeihana, N. (2011). Using rubrics to give voice to Indigenous values. In E. J. Davidson, N. Wehipeihana, K. McKegg, & P. Rogers (Eds.), The rubric revolution (pp. 15-23) [Presentation at the Australasian Evaluation Society conference, Sydney, Australia]. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/rubric-revolution

Wehipeihana, N., McKegg, K., Thompson, V., & Pipi, K. (2015). Cultural responsiveness through developmental evaluation: Indigenous innovations in sport and traditional Māori recreation. In Patton, M. Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (Eds.), Developmental evaluation exemplars: Principles in practice (pp. 25-44). Guilford Press. Project summary, Te Whetu Rēhua rubric, and link to a video explaining the rubric available online: https://www.kinnect.co.nz/he-oranga-poutama/

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>