Evaluation as the Conscience of Freedom and Democracy
Main Article Content
Abstract
It wasn’t long ago that democratic political systems along with the free-market forces of globalization were generally expected to spread unchecked throughout the world. Only five years ago most would have found it unbelievable that the leading democratic free-market economies of the world would have significant trouble competing with non-democratic state-run economies and far flung terrorist organizations. Now this is obviously the case, and these competitors are aggressively spreading their influence around the world. This paper suggests the perhaps counter-intuitive notion that improvements to the theory and practice of evaluation can play a perhaps critical role in improving the relative performance of market-based democratic systems and explores what some of these potential improvements might entail.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Alkin, M. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157
Bezzi, C. (2006). Evaluation pragmatics. Evaluation, 12(1): 56-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064189
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064189
Chelimsky, Eleanor. (2006). A clash of cultures: Improving the "fit" between evaluative independence and the political requirements of a democratic society. American Evaluation Association, Twentieth Anniversary Conference, November 3, 2006.
Forss, K., Kruse, S., Taut, S., Tenden, E. (2006). Chasing a ghost: An essay on Participatory evaluation and capacity development. Evaluation, 12(1): 128-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064190
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064190
Gysen, J., Bruyninckx, H. and Bachus, K. (2006). The modus narrandi: A methodology for evaluating effects of environmental policy. Evaluation, 12(1): 95-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176
Hanberger, A. (2006). Evaluation of and for democracy. Evaluation, 12(1): 17-37. House, E. (2006). Democracy and evaluation (Article based on a keynote address at the 2004 European Evaluation Society Conference in Berlin, Germany). Evaluation, 12(1): 119-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064194
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064194
House, E. and Howe, K. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243252
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243252
Pennisi, G. and Scandizzo, P. (2006). Economic evaluation in an age of uncertainty. Evaluation, 12(1): 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064174
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064174
Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy: The missing link? Evaluation, 12(1): 38-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064191
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064191
Scriven, M. (2006). "Key Evaluation Checklist" found online at The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
Stame, N. (2006). Governance, Democracy and Evaluation. Evaluation, 12(1): 7-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064173
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064173
Van Der Meer, F. and Edelenbos, J. (2006). Evaluation in multi-actor policy processes. Evaluation, 12(1): 201-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006066972
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006066972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006066972