Unintended Consequences of using Tests to Improve Learning: How Improvement-Oriented Resources Heighten Conceptions of Assessment as School Accountability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over the past decade, the New Zealand government has created a set of resources to support teachers’ use of assessment for learning. These include Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning (asTTle), a software program enabling teachers to create personalized but standardized tests for diagnostic purposes, and Assess to Learn (AtoL), an intensive professional development program. These resources were expected to increase teacher agreement that improvement is the major purpose of assessment. Instead, a 2008 sample of teachers completing the Teacher Conceptions of Assessment questionnaire showed significantly higher agreement that assessment is about school accountability than participants in previous national surveys. Unlike previous surveys, the correlation between school accountability and improvement conceptions was not statistically significant. However, as only the improvement conception predicted the practices teachers used to define assessment (β = .32), it appears that these teachers still saw many of the practices they used in the classroom (e.g. oral and interactive assessments) as improvement-oriented. Interviews with twenty-six of the surveyed teachers identified that while a few saw the new resources as contributing to improvement and accountability purposes, a larger group failed to make that connection. This second group seemed to be unable to accept that tests, an assessment genre traditionally associated with school and student accountability, could be meaningfully used for improvement at the classroom level. These data show that schools and individuals mediate the implementation of any policy initiative and can therefore cause it to have a range of often unintended consequences. In light of this, the thinking of teachers and other educational stakeholders should be taken into account when enacting policy changes.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
Funding data
-
University of Auckland
Grant numbers Faculty of Education Research Development Fund (grant #3609273/9215)
References
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.
Asch, R. L. (1976). Teaching beliefs and evaluation. Art Education, 29(6), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3192114
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 20-50). Chicago: NSSE & University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x
Brown, G. T. L. (2002). Teachers' Conceptions of Assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ.
Brown, G. T. L. (2004a). Measuring attitude with positively packed self-report ratings: Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports, 94, 1015-1024. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.1015-1024
Brown, G. T. L. (2004b). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Policy, Principles and Practice, 11(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
Brown, G. T. L. (2006). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Validation of an abridged instrument. Psychological Reports, 99, 166-170. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.1.166-170
Brown, G. T. L. (2007, December). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Comparing measurement models for primary and secondary teachers in New Zealand. Paper presented at the annual conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Christchurch, NZ.
Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01348-000
Brown, G. T. L. (2009). Teachers' self-reported assessment practices and conceptions: Using structural equation modelling to examine measurement and structural models. In T. Teo & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Structural equation modelling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 243-266). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. (2008, November). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Interview validation of survey responses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Palmerston North, NZ.
Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., & Keegan, P. J. (2008). An introduction to educational assessment, measurement, and evaluation: Improving the quality of teacher-based assessment (2nd ed.). Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education.
Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (in press). Assessment for improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers' conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Policy, Principles and Practice.
Brown, G. T. L., & Lake, R. (2006, November). Queensland teachers' conceptions of teaching, learning, curriculum and assessment: Comparisons with New Zealand teachers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, Australia.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(4), 468-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101029004003
Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(4), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00072.x
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S., Shawn, M., & Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159- 179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255-296). New York: MacMillan.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London: Sage.
Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
Crooks, T. J. (2002). Educational assessment in New Zealand schools. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice, 9(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594022000001959
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003, February). Standards and assessments: Where we are and what we need. Teachers College Record. Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://www.tcrecord.org
Education Gazette. (2002). Better assessment likely. Education Gazette, 81(6). Retrieved June 6, 2009, from http://www.edgazette.govt.nz/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleId=6155
Guthrie, J. T. (2002). Preparing students for high-stakes test taking in reading. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 370- 391). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0872071774.16
Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 25-68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X027001025
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Robyn, A., Russell, J. L., et al. (2007). Standards-based accountability under no Child Left Behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education. https://doi.org/10.7249/MG589
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (in press). The complexity of teachers' conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice.
Hattie, J. A. C., & Brown, G. T. L. (2004, September). Cognitive processes in asTTle: The SOLO Taxonomy. asTTle Tech. Rep. #43, University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
Hattie, J. A. C., & Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Technology for school-based assessment and assessment for learning: Development principles from New Zealand. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.36.2.g
Hattie, J. A. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Keegan, P. J. (2003). A national teacher-managed, curriculum-based assessment system: Assessment Tools for Teaching & Learning asTTle). International Journal of Learning, 10, 771-778.
Hattie, J. A. C., Brown, G. T. L., Keegan, P. J., MacKay, A. J., Irving, S. E., Cutforth, S., et al. (2004). Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning asTTle) manual (Version4,2005ed.). Wellington, NZ: University of Auckland / Ministry of Education/Learning Media.
Hattie, J. A., Brown, G. T. L., Ward, L., Irving, S. E., & Keegan, P. J. (2006). Formative evaluation of an educational assessment technology innovation: Developers' insights into Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning (asTTle). Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5(3), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v3i5.50
Heaton, J. B. (1975). Writing English language tests. London: Longman.
Hershberg, T. (2002). Comment. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy: 2002 (pp. 324-333). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/pep.2002.0006
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kahn, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598719
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177052
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut- off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49.
McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596593
Ministry of Education. (1994). Assessment: Policy to Practice. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2001). Developing teachers' assessment literacy. Curriculum Update, 47.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1-13. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Monfils, L. F., Firestone, W. A., Hickes, J. E., Martinez, M. C., Schorr, R. Y., & Camilli, G. (2004). Teaching to the test. In W. A. Firestone, R. Y. Schorr & L. F. Monfils (Eds.), The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, assessment, and educational reform (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, NJ: LEA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609946
Noble, A. J., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Old and new beliefs about measurement-driven reform: "The more things change, the more they stay the same" (CSE Technical Report No. 373). Los Angeles,: University of California, Los Angeles, CRESST.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Peddie, R. (2000). Evaluation of the assessment for better learning professional development programmes: Final report. Auckland, NZ: Auckland UniServices Limited.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: AERA.
Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Poskitt, J., & Taylor, K. (2008, July). National education findings of Assess to Learn (AtoL) report. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (ACEL Monograph No. 41). Melbourne, AU: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Smith, M. L., & Fey, P. (2000). Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051005002
Stecher, B. M., & Barron, S. (2001). Unintended consequences of test-based accountability when testing in "milepost" grades. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0704_02
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: MacMillan.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES) Report. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Tittle, C. K. (1994). Toward an educational psychology of assessment for teaching and learning: Theories, contexts, and validation arguments. Educational Psychologist, 29, 149- 162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2903_4
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Warren, E., & Nisbet, S. (1999). The relationship between the purported use of assessment techniques and beliefs about the uses of assessment. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.), 22nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education and Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 22 (pp. 515-521). Adelaide, SA: MERGA.
Webb, N. L. (1992). Assessment of students' knowledge of mathematics: Steps toward a theory. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 661-683). New York: Macmillan.