Using Objective Stylometric Techniques to Evaluate New Testament Authorship
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Bible scholars often debate the authorship of certain books appearing in the New Testament.
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate New Testament authorship by using stylometric analytical techniques
Setting: This research focuses on texts appearing in the New Testament.
Intervention: This was an exploratory research on evaluation study with no intervention.
Research Design: A powerful, state-of-the-art psychometric model was applied to Biblical text in an effort to identify correlations among word usage and writing style among each of the New Testament books.
Data Collection and Analysis: Strong’s Concordance was used to provide original Greek text. Computer programming was necessary to create a worksheet that contained a list of New Testament books, each Greek word appearing in the New Testament, and a count of each word’s appearance relative to each book. Rasch-based Principal Components Analysis of standardized residual correlations was used to map stylistic similarities and differences.
Findings: With regard to substantive findings, the gospels (Matthew, Luke, Mark, and John) and the narrative book of Acts were closely correlated. Other texts presented a mix of expected and unexpected findings. With regard to other findings, the technique presented in this study offers a great deal of promise to various research and evaluation practices.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814
Arrindell, W. A., & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variable ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900205
Barr, G. K. (2003). Two styles in the New Testament epistles. Literacy & Linguistic Computing, 18(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.3.235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.3.235
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kenny, A. (1986). A stylometric study of the New Testament. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2001). Who wrote Paul's epistles? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 15(1), 800-801.
Linacre, J. M. (2010). WINSTEPS® (Version 3.70.1.1). Computer Software. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.
Linacre, J. M. (2011). Dimensionality: Contrasts & variances. Retrieved Jan. 31, 2012, from http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?principalcomponents.htm
Whissell, C. (2006). Comparison of the books of the New Testament (English Translation) in terms of emotion and word use. Psychological Reports, 98, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.1.57-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.1.57-64