Donald T. Campbell’s Evolutionary Perspective and its Implications for Evaluation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Donald T. Campbell, a scientist, humanist, and generalist, left an indelible mark on the evaluation discipline through his methodological work. He is less well known within the evaluation community for his landmark contributions to biology and philosophy. Yet, the evolutionary epistemology that he pioneered has significant implications for evaluation.
Purpose: This article examines the relevance of Donald T. Campbell’s blind variation and natural selection approach to evaluation theory, including an elucidation of its basic logic, its social remit as a discipline and trans-discipline, and its summative and formative functions. It also sketches in broad strokes the implications of evolutionary thinking for evaluation practice, including natural and artificial selection, ontogeny, phylogeny, co-evolution, and feedback. Finally, it comments on Campbell’s Experimenting Society vision and the ongoing craze for randomised evaluations in development through an evolutionary lens.
Setting: Not applicable.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: Not applicable.
Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.
Findings: Not applicable.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2004). Evaluation theory tree revisited. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 381-392). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157
Bamberger, M., Rao, V., & Woolcock, M. (2010). Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation: Experiences from international development. World Bank Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 5245. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n24
Bedecarrats, F., Guerin, I., & Roubaud, F. (2017). All that glitters is not gold. The political economy of randomized evaluations in development. Development and Change, 0(0), 1-28.
Campbell, D. T. (1950). The indirect assessment of social attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054114
Campbell, D. T. (1971). Methods for the experimenting society [Paper presentation]. Eastern Psychological Association, New York City and American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper (pp. 413-463). Open Court.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1974). Qualitative knowing in action research [Kurt Lewin Award Address]. Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 81st Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Campbell, D. T. (1988). Descriptive epistemology: Psychological, sociological, and evolutionary. In E. S. Overman (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers (pp. 435-486). University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1990). Epistemological roles for selection theory. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Evolution, cognition and realism (p. 7). University Press of America.
Campbell, D. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In W. N. Dunn (Ed.), The experimenting society: Essays in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 35-36). Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003578192-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003578192-2
Campbell, D. T., & Mohr, P. J. (1950). The effect of ordinal position upon responses to items in a checklist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061818
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
Chelimsky, E., & Shadish, W. R. (Eds.). (1997). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348896
Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 424-455. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.424
Duflo, E., & Kremer, M. (2005). Use of randomization in the evaluation of development effectiveness. In G. K. Pitman et al. (Eds.), Evaluating development effectiveness (World Bank Series on Evaluation and Development, Vol. 7). Transaction Publishers.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books.
Kelly, R. M., & Gregware, P. (1998). The experimenting society: Towards an inclusive democratic community. In W. N. Dunn (Ed.), The experimenting society: Essays in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 189-210). Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003578192-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003578192-8
Kirkhart, K. E. (2010). Eyes on the prize: Multicultural validity and evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010373645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010373645
Kropotkin, P. (1989). Mutual aid. Black Rose Books.
Matthews, M. (2017). Transformative public policy: A new strategy for coping with uncertainty and risk. Routledge.
Moore, M., & Khagram, S. (2004). On creating public value: What business might learn from government about strategic management. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper 3. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Munz, P. (2001). Philosophical Darwinism: On the origin of knowledge by means of natural selection (pp. 151-160). Routledge.
Overman, E. S. (Ed.). (1988). Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 290-314). University of Chicago Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. The Guilford Press.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1974). Replies to my critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper (pp. 1061-1062). Open Court.
Popper, K. R. (1978, April 7). Three worlds [The Tanner Lecture on Human Values]. University of Michigan. http://www.15926.info/functional-physical-object/popper80.pdf
Quine, W. V. (1969). Naturalized epistemology. In Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69-90). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204-004
Raup, D. M. (1994). The role of extinction in evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 91, 6758-6763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.6758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.6758
Ravallion, M. (2009). Evaluation in the practice of development. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp002
Robertson, D. S. (1991). Feedback theory and Darwinian evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 152, 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80393-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80393-5
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (pp. 363-364). Sage Publications.
Scriven, M. (2016). The last frontier of evaluation: Ethics. In S. I. Donaldson & R. Picciotto (Eds.), Evaluation for an equitable society (pp. 38-39). Information Age Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-68123-445-820251003
Shadish, W. R., & Cook, T. D. (1998). Donald Campbell and evaluation theory. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409801900318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409801900318
Shaver, P., & Staines, G. (1971). Problems facing Campbell's 'experimenting society'. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 7(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100700203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100700203
Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J., Forss, K., Davies, & Befani, B. (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluation (Working Paper 38). Department for International Development. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2012.100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2012.100
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). The metaevaluation imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00127-8
Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practices in public service and social action programs. Russell Sage Foundation.
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioural economics. W.W. Norton Publishers.
Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton University Press.
Trochim, W. M. K. (1998). Donald T. Campbell and research design. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 407-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409801900316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80225-2
Trochim, W. M. K. (2007, April 24). Evolutionary perspectives in evaluation: Theoretical and practical implications [Paper presentation]. Eastern Evaluation Research Society. https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/research/EERS2007/Evolutionary%20Perspectives%20in%20Evaluation%20Theoretical%20and%20Practical%20Implications.pdf
Van de Ven, A. H., & Grazman, D. N. (1999). Evolution in a nested hierarchy: A genealogy of Twin Cities health care organizations, 1853-1995. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204703.n11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204703.n11
Vedung, E. (2010). Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation, 16(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389010372452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389010372452
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Weiss, C. H. (2000). The experimenting society in a political world. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Validity and social experimentation: Donald Campbell's legacy (Chapter 11). Sage Publications.