Taking Evaluation Contexts Seriously: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation in Extreme Unpredictability
Main Article Content
Abstract
The following paper details the evaluation of a public health education project in the state of Maine. Evaluation of education projects presents a challenge, in that the effects of the intervention are not easy to trace and outside influences difficult to impossible to control. This study approached this difficult issue at the start by focusing on one variable for which data are readily available (namely blood lead testing rates). The evaluation was further enhanced by use of a model called "RE- AIM", which measures the reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation and maintenance of educational projects (Glasgow, et.al. 1999). Measurements centered on data tracked through newly created databases and focused on elements directly attributable to the project (i.e. behavior of medical personnel trained through project activities). Finally, small focus groups and interactions with families served by the program were used to derive qualitative data that provided a broader perspective on the success of activities. As the program ultimately seeks to entirely eliminate childhood lead poisoning, this paper concludes with a discussion of areas that continue to need attention for future education projects.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409-428.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027982
Campbell, D. T. (1971). The experimenting society. In Overman, E.S. (Ed., 1989), Methodology and epistemology for social science (pp. 315-335). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Ninety-five theses for reforming programme evaluation. In Madaus, G.F.; Scriven, M.S. & Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds), Evaluation models. Viewpoints in educational and human services evaluation (pp. 405-412). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6675-8_24
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981, 103-127.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243252
Jalbert, Y., Pinault, L., Renaud, G., & Zúñiga, R. (1997). Epsilon. A self-evaluation guide for community organizations. [English adaptation by D. Buckley- Couvrett]. Montréal: Coalition des organisms de lutte contre le sida - COCQ-sida.
Kushner, S. (2000). Personalizing evaluation. London, UK: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209557
Laperrière, H. (in press). La investigación evaluative en el movimiento social del contexto sociopolítico y sociocultural. Los desafíos metodológicos de la urgencia de las acciones sociosanitarias en regions alejadas. Forum Qualitative Social Research. Volumen Temático FQS. Estado del arte de la investigación cualitativa en Ibero América.
Laperrière, H., & Zúñiga, R. (in press). Sociopolitical determinants of an AIDS prevention program: Multiple actors and vertical relationships of control and influence. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice.
Mendel, G. (1998). L'acte est une aventure. Du sujet métaphysique au sujet de l'acte pouvoir. Paris, France: La découverte.
https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.mende.1998.01
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflexive Practitioner. How professionals think in action, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Scriven, M. (1972). Pros and cons of goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Comment, 3, 4.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Scriven, M. (2004). Reflections. In Alkin, M.C. Evaluation roots. Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 183-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zúñiga, R. (1975). The experimenting society and radical social reform. The role of the social scientist in Chile's Unidad Popular Experience. American Psychologist, February, 99-115.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076833
Zúñiga, R., & Laperrière, H. (sobre imprensa). A avaliação comunitária : conflitos verticales e ambiguidades metodológicas. In Mercado, F.J. & Bosi, M.L.M. (Org.), Avaliação de Programas e Serviços de saúde : enfoques emergentes. Editora Vozes.
Zúñiga, R. & Luly, M.H. (2005). Savoir-faire et savoir-dire : un guide d'évaluation communautaire. Montréal, Canada: Coalition des organismes de lutte contre le sida (COCQ-sida).