The Politics of Local Control and Program Evaluation in Community Context
Main Article Content
Abstract
This is a case study of an evaluation of a Youth Fair Chance (YFC) program that discusses multiple challenges faced by our evaluation team. We consider the role of evaluators. in relation to the overall program structure, struggles among organizational stakeholders with special interests, and power differentials which impacted policy decision making, control of information, and ultimately, the outcomes of this evaluation. In identifying the particular issues that arose throughout the evaluation process, we hope others who face similar issues will benefit from our insights. We realize the issues we face are endemic to any evaluation process.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography.
Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links.
Members may also deposit reference lists here too.
Abma, T. A. (2000). Stakeholder conflict: A case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 232(2), 199-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00006-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00006-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00006-9
Banner, D. K, Doctors, S. I., & Gordon, A. C. (1975). The politics of program evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
Chelimsky, E. (1987). Linking program evaluation to user needs. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 72-99). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury, CA: Sage Publications.
Christie, C.A., & Alkin, M.C. (2003). The uses-oriented evaluator's role in formulating a program theory: Using a theory-driven approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 373-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400306
https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400306
Community Toolbox. Youth Fair Chance. (1995, February 12). http://www.ezec.gov/toolbox/guide/emp/rg_empl.html.
Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1986). Program evaluation: The worldly science. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 193-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.001205
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.001205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.001205
Corson, W., Dynarski, M., Haimson, J., & Rosenberg, L. (1996). The positive force of Youth Fair Chance. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Resource, Inc.
Folkman, D. V., & Rai, K. (1997). Reflections on facilitating a participatory community self-evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(4), 455-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00025-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00025-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00025-6
Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. New York, NY: Continuum Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1987). The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 202-234). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Hallett, M., & Rogers, R. (1994). The push for "truth in sentencing": Evaluating competing stakeholder constructions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(2), 187-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)90056-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)90056-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)90056-6
Hills, D. (1998). Engaging new social movements. Human Relations, 51(12), 1457-1476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805101203
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805101203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805101203
Kirsh, B. T., Krupa, S., Horgan, D., Kelly, D., & Carr, S. (2005). Making it better: Building evaluation capacity in community mental health. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 28(3), 234-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/28.2005.234.241
https://doi.org/10.2975/28.2005.234.241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/28.2005.234.241
Lipsey, M. W., Crosse, S., Dunkle, J., Pollard, J. A., & Stobart, G. (1985). Evaluation: The state of the art and the sorry state of the science. In D. S. Cordray (Ed.), Utilizing prior research in evaluation planning (pp.7-28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1398
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1398
McIlvaine, M. (1995, April, 2). Youth Fair Chance can offer hope to those in danger. The Journal Times. p.11A.
Metro, G. (1995, June, 29). Fair chance programs set to go. The Journal Times. p.2B.
Metro, G. (1995, May 24). Youth plans start. The Journal Times. p.1B.
Mog, J. (2004). Struggling with sustainability - a comparative framework for evaluating sustainable development programs. World Development, 32(12), 2139-2140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.002
Naumes, W., & Naumes, M. J. (1999). The art and craft of case writing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Needels, K., Dynarski, M., & Corson, W. (1998). Helping young people in high-poverty communities: Lessons from Youth Fair Chance. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Resource, Inc.
Palumbo, D. J. (1987). Politics and evaluation. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation. (pp. 12-46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
Patton, M. Q. (1987). Evaluation's political inherency: Practical implications for design and use. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation. (pp. 100-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Posavac, E. J., & Carey R.G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Poulin, M. E., Harris, P. W., & Jones, P.R. (2000). The significance of definitions of success in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 24(5), 516-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0002400504
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0002400504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0002400504
Quist, J. (1993, July 12). $166 million released for summer jobs. Nation's Cities Weekly. p.12.
United States Bureau of the Census. County and city data book (1994, 12th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Van Sant, J. (1989). Qualitative analysis in developmental evaluations. Evaluation Review, 13(3), 257-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300305
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8901300305
Waysman, M., & Savaya, R. (1997). Mixed method evaluation: A case study. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 227-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90029-5
https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409701800304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409701800304
Weiss, C. H. (1991). Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con. Knowledge and Policy, 4(Spring/Summer), 37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692747
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692747
Weiss, C. H. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. J. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 47-70). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.