DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3

Published: 20-Oct-05

In This Issue

Michael Scriven

i-ii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.97
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.98
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.99
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.100

The 2004 Claremont Debate: Lipsey vs. Scriven

Stewart I. Donaldson, Christina A. Christie

60-77

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.101
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.104
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.103
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.105

A Call to Action: The First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry

Chris L. S. Coryn, Daniela C. Schröter, Michael Scriven

155-165

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.106

Evaluation in Canada

Chris L. S. Coryn

166-171

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.107
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.110
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.111

Evaluation in Japan

Ryo Sasaki

200-204

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.112
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.113

New Directions for Evaluation

Chris L. S. Coryn

209-213

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.115