Current Developments in Assessment for Learning in Universities and High Schools in Michigan: Problems and Perspectives in Mathematics and Science Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assessment for Learning (AfL) or formative assessment has the potential for raising standards and student achievement. This article describes research conducted by graduate students in an NSF-funded capacity-building project with goals to increase research in the disciplines of science and mathematics education. As background, a literature review shows parallels between assessment for learning research developed over the past two decades in England with assessment reform efforts in school mathematics and science in the U.S. A series of five research projects, conducted by Western Michigan University (WMU) AfL project scholars in fall 2008, examines (1) the prominence of assessment for learning in university course syllabi at WMU and (2) at public universities across the state of Michigan, (3) its prominence in policy statements in a sample of Michigan high schools, (4) the development of benchmarking practices with preservice teachers, and (5) a comparison of existing AfL observation protocols used in classroom research. These reports represent the range of potentially important areas that may prove fruitful for moving research on assessment in mathematics and science education forward.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0733590.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
Funding data
-
National Science Foundation
Grant numbers 0733590
References
Airasian, P., & Gullickson, A. R. (1995). Teacher self-evaluation tool kit. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
Alexander, R.J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York, England: Dialogos.
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (Eds.) (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teachers' role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82(301), 55-61.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Bracey, G. E. (2000). The tenth Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170008200210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170008200210
Bracey, G. E. (2002). The twelfth Bracey report on the condition of public education. condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400209
Bracey, G. E. (2006). The condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 151-166). https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608800213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608800213
Brennan, J. (1995). Benchmarking: An alternative to OFSTED: Lessons for higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889510082417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889510082417
Bright, G. W., & Joyner, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). Classroom assessment in mathematics: Views from a national science foundation working conference. New York: University Press of America.
Bryant, D., & Driscoll, M. (1998). Exploring classroom assessment in mathematics: A guide for professional development. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bullock, K., & Wikeley, F. (1999). Improving learning in year 9: Making use of personal learning plans. Educational Studies, 25(1), 19- 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055699997945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055699997945
Chuska, K.R. (1995). Improving classroom questions: A teacher's guide to increasing student motivation, participation, and higher-level thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Dillon, J. T. (1994). Using discussion in classrooms. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Dodd, J. L., & Turner, M. A. (2000). Is benchmarking appropriate for small businesses? National Public Accountant, 45(6), 36-38, 44.
Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Floden, R. (2007). Educational policy research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1247-1280). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., Lappan, G., & Phillips, E. D. (1996). Getting to know CMP: An introduction to the Connected Mathematics Project. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Fontana, B., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01112.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01112.x
Fynewever, H. (2008). A comparison of the effectiveness of web-based and paper-based homework for general chemistry. The Chemical Educator, 13, 264-269.
Gamire, E., & Pearson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: National Research Council and The National Academy of Engineering.
Glaser, R. (1990). Toward new models of assessment. Pittsburg, PA: Learning and Research Development Center.
Grouws, D. A. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hirsch, C. R., Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., & Schoen, H. L. (1994). Implementing the CPMP curriculum. Kalamazoo: Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Western Michigan University.
Hirsch, C. R., Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., & Schoen, H. L. (1995, November). Teaching sensible mathematics in sense-making ways with CPMP. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(8), 694-700. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.88.8.0694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.88.8.0694
Horizon Research, Inc. (1999). Local systemic change through teach enhancement classroom observation protocol. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from www.horizon-research.com/instruments
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The student evaluation standards: How to improve evaluations of students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2009a). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2009a). Assessment for learning benchmarking project. Unpublished document.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2009b). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Keeley, P. (2008) Science formative assessments: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Kulm, G. (1994). Mathematics assessment: What works in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Lambdin, D. V. (1993). The NCTM's 1989 evaluation standards: Recycled ideas whose time has come? In N.L. Webb & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom, NCTM 1993 Yearbook (pp. 7-16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Martinez, J. G. R., & Martinez, N. C. (1992). Re-examining repeated testing and teacher effects in a remedial mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01028.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01028.x
McCallum, B., & Clarke, S. (2001). Gillingham partnership formative assessment Project teacher inservice materials. London: Institute of Education.
McKeachie, W. (1986). Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Michigan Department of Education. (2008). Frequently asked questions for MTTC. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_5683_5857-116214--,00.html#mttc1
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved June 20, 2009, from the National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences Web site: nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
O'Brien, J. G., Millis, B. J., & Cohen, M. W. (2008). The course syllabus: A learning-centered approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2007). Retrieved June 30, 2009, from the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Web site: www.pisa.oecd.org
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (.n.d.). Assessment for learning guidance. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from www.qca.org.uk/qca_4334.aspx
Remillard, J. T., Herbal-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.
Romberg, T. A. (Ed.). (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Schoen, H. L., Bean, D. L., & Ziebarth, S. W. (1996). Embedding communication throughout the curriculum. Communication in mathematics: K-12 and beyond, NCTM 1996 Yearbook (pp. 170-179). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Scottish Qualifications Authority. (2006). Assessment is for learning: Self-assessment toolkit. Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, 1, pp. 39-83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Senk, S. L., Beckmann, C. E., & Thompson, D. R. (1997). Assessment and grading in high school mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 187-215. https://doi.org/10.2307/749761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.2.0187
Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz- Prino, M. A., Ayala, C. C., Young, D. B., Tomita, M. K., Brandon, P. R., & Pottenger, F. M. III. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning in assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Silver, E. A. (1992). Assessment and mathematics education reform in the United States. Pittsburg, PA: Learning and Research Development Center.
Standard & Poor's. (2009). SchoolMatters. Retrieved June 27, 2009 from www.schoolmatters.com
Steinbring, H., Bussi, M.G., & Sierpinska, A. (1998). Language and communication in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stiggins, R. J. (1988). Revitalizing classroom assessment: The highest instructional priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 363-368.
Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1999.tb00004.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1999.tb00004.x
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence OF assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). (2007). Retrieved June 39, 2009 from the National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences Web site: nces.ed.gov/timss/
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley.
Webb, N. L. (1994). Thoughts on assessment in the mathematics classroom. In N. L. Webb & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Classroom assessment in mathematics (pp. 101-114). Lanham, MD: Rowman, Littlefield.
Webb, N. L., & Coxford, A. F. (1993). Assessment in the mathematics classroom. NCTM 1993 Yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Whiting, B., Van Burgh, J. W., & Reder, G. F. (1995). Mastery learning in the classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 382 688)
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053-1098). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wilson, L. D., & Kenney, P. A. (2003). Classroom and large-scale assessment. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 53-67). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.