Theory Creation, Modification, and Testing: An Information Processing Model and Theory of the Anticipated and Unanticipated Consequences of Research and Development
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Extending Merton’s (1936) work on the consequences of purposive social action, the model, theory and taxonomy outlined here incorporates and formalizes both anticipated and unanticipated research findings in a unified theoretical framework. The model of anticipated research findings was developed initially by Carifio (1975, 1977) and was followed by the addition of the unanticipated findings component by Perla (2006). This is the first formal model, theory and synthesis of anticipated and unanticipated research findings developed to date. The wide-ranging consequences and implications of the model are discussed.
Purpose: To the extent that educational researchers, philosophers and scholars reduce unanticipated findings solely to chance, whimsy, or inspiration they declare these occurrences impossible to effectively predict, model or understand. This article provides a way to conceptualize and formally model anticipated and unanticipated research findings. Many concrete examples from the history of science and research and evaluation methodology are provided to illustrate the model as well as various details of an application of the model in developing instructional materials.
Setting: Nature of science instructional materials development effort.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: Theory and model development using quantitative and qualitative methods including literature review and original model evaluations.
Data Collection and Analysis: Content analysis and modified Q-sorts of research related documents, journals, logs, literature and emails as well as various theory construction and modification techniques.
Findings: This article demonstrates that a formal model and theory of anticipated and unanticipated research findings can be developed and that such models should inform a broad range of research and evaluation efforts that are conducted daily worldwide. Nine key research and evaluation principles were derived to supplement the formal model and its operations that should be helpful to novice as well as experienced researchers regardless of the research methodology or strategies they are employing.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Ashcraft (2002). Cognition (3rd edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Barnes, A., & Thagard, P. (1996). Emotional Decisions. Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Erlbaum, 426-429.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Carifio, J. (1975). A Standard and Command-Wide Model for Developing Scientific and Technical Instructional Materials. United States Office of Naval Research, Alexandria, VA.
Carifio, J. (1976). Piaget's need for a construct of metaphoric operativity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, Ma.
Carifio, J. (1977). Toward a macro model of instructional components. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
Carifio, J. and Perla, R. (2009). A Critique of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature on the Use of Diagrams, Graphs and Other Visual Aids in the Learning of Scientific-Technical Content from Expository Texts and Instruction. Interchange, 41, 4, 403- 436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9102-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9102-7
Chomsky, N. (1957/1965). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043943
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076829
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10011-000
Fensham, P.J. (2004). Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0175-5_1
Geelan, D. (2006). Undead Theories: Constructivism, Eclecticism and Research in Education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903640
Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., & Taskar, B. (2002). Learning probabilistic models of relational structure. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 679-707.
Glass, G. (2000). Meta-Analysis at 25. Paper recovered from the worldwide web on January 15, 2007 at: http://glass.ed.asu/gene/papers/meta 25.html
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research. Harcourt College Publishers.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 309-330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
Merton, R. K. & E. Barber. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity. Princeton University Press.
Morley, D. (2003). Out of the barn. ISA Publications.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific Research in Education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, (Eds.). Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Perla, R. J., & Carifio, J. (2005). Pseudo- science and metaphoric operativity: Making the case for a cognitive model of scientific change. Paper presented at the eighth biennial meeting of the International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group, Leeds, England.
Perla, R. J. (2006). Use and augmentation of a formal model and theory to develop instructional material to teach undergraduates about the nature of science, scientific knowledge and scientific change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
Perla, R. and Carifio, J. (2008). Can our Conception of the Nature of Science be Tentative without Qualification? Journal of Education Thought, Autumn, 42, 2, 127-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jet.v42i2.52460
Perla, R. and Carifio, J. (2009). Toward a General and Unified View of Educational Research and Educational Evaluation: Bridging Philosophy and Methodology. Journal of Multi- Disciplinary Evaluation, 5, 11, 38-55. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i11.200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i11.200
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chicago: University if Chicago Press.
Shapin, S. (2004). The accidental scientist. American Scientist, 92, July- August Online Edition.
Shulman, L.S., Golde, C.M., Bueschel, A.C. & Garabedian, K.J. (2006). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025
Thorndike, E.L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: A.G. Seiler. https://doi.org/10.1037/10881-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10881-000
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8, 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X