Planning and Evaluation: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article outlines the principles, tools, and practices of Project Cycle Management (PCM), a methodological approach integrating planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. PCM is aimed at improving the success of development projects by creating sustainable benefits for target groups.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Chelimsky, E. (1997). Thoughts for a new evaluation society. Keynote speech delivered at the December 1996 conference of the UK Evaluation Society. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 97-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300107
https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300107
Cracknell, B. E. (2000). Evaluating development aid, issues, problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dale, R. (2004a). Development planning, concepts and tools for planners, managers and facilitators. London, England: Zed Books.
Dale, R. (2004b): Evaluating development programmes and projects (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eggers, H. W., & Chelimsky, E. (1999). Evaluation purposes and use, what can we expect? Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5(1), 92-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563899922208841
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563899922208841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563899922208841
Eggers, H. W. (2002). Project cycle management. Evaluation, 8(4), 496-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890260620667
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890260620667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890260620667
Gysen, J., Bruyninckx, H., & Bachus, K. (2006). The modus narrandi, a methodology for evaluating effects of environmental policy. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 12(1), 95-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064176
OECD-DAC. (1991). Criteria for evaluating development assistance. Paris, France: OECD. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scriven, M. (1974). Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Comment, 3(4), 1-4.
Scriven, M. (2006, June) Key evaluation checklist. Retrieved October 27, 2006 from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/kec_june06.pdf