Evaluation Independence in Organizations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Evaluation independence is a neglected issue in the literature. Yet, it is a critical aspect of evaluation governance in organizations.
Purpose: The article draws on organizational theory, institutional economics and international development evaluation practice to define evaluation independence in organizations, outline principles geared to the design of evaluation processes within organizations and trigger a debate on evaluation independence in the evaluation community.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: Literature review informed by personal exposure to management of the World Bank Independent Evaluation Group.
Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.
Findings: Independent and self-evaluation are complementary and synergistic. Organizational theory demonstrates that a judicious combination of independent and self-evaluation contributes to managerial accountability and double loop learning.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
Funding data
References
Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115-125.
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. New York, NY: Norton.
Evaluation Cooperation Group (2010). Good practice standards on independence of international financial institutions' central evaluation departments. Retrieved from https://wpqr1.adb.org/LotusQuickr/ecg/Main.nsf/$defaultview/AA95B62CF943F82E48257 74B003A82E0/$File/GPS%20on%20MDB%20Governance%20and%20Independence%20final%2007-02-10.pdf?OpenElement.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to declines in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Love, A. J. (1991). Internal evaluation: Building organizations from within. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984546
Mayne, J. (2008). Building an evaluative culture for effective evaluation and results management. (ILAC Working Paper 8). Rome, Italy: Institutional Learning and Change Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/publications/briefs/ILAC Brief 20 Evaluative Culture pdf.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olson, M., Jr. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching for understanding. American Educator, 17(3), 28-35.
Picciotto, R. (2005). The value of evaluation standards: A comparative assessment. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 2(3), 30-59. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v2i3.100
Picciotto, R. (2011). The logic of evaluation professionalism. Evaluation, 17(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011403362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011403362
Pollitt, C. & Boukaert, Geert (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295969.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295969.001.0001
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80178-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80178-7