Review of New Directions for Evaluation, Volume 106: Theorists' Models in Action

Main Article Content

Chris L. S. Coryn

Abstract

The summer 2005 issue of New Directions for Evaluation, “Theorists’ Models in Action”, edited by Marvin C. Alkin and Christina A. Christie is, in part, inspired by the “Radnor Middle School” case study conducted in the early 1980s (Brandt, 1981). In the Radnor case study notable theorists including Scriven, Stake, Eisner, and Popham were asked to explain how they would evaluate Radnor’s humanities curriculum.


In this issue Alkin and Christie asked four contemporary theorists—Jennifer C. Greene, Gary T. Henry, Stewart I. Donaldson, and Jean A. King—to describe how they would evaluate the case of the “Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Partnership Academy.” The Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Partnership Academy is essentially a “unique partnership between the [school] district and a nonprofit educational company specializing in innovative school interventions for low-performing students” (Eisenberg, Winters, & Alkin, 2005, p. 5).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Coryn, C. L. S. (2006). Review of New Directions for Evaluation, Volume 106: Theorists’ Models in Action. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 3(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v3i4.93
Section
Global Review: Publications

References

Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (Eds.) (2005). Theorists' models in action. New Directions for Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.155

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.155

Brandt, R. S. (1981). Applied strategies for curriculum evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Coryn, C. L. S. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness [Review of the book Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness]. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 405-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278767

https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278767

Donaldson, S. I. (2004). Using program theory-driven science to crack the Da Vinci code. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), theorists' models in action (pp. 65-84). New Directions in Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.152

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.152

Eisenberg, N., Winters, L., & Alkin, M. C. (2005). The case: Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Partnership Academy. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), theorists' models in action (pp. 5-14). New Directions in Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.148

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.148

Greene, J. C. (2005). A value-engaged approach for evaluating the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Academy. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), theorists' models in action (pp. 27-46). New Directions in Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.150

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.150

Henry, G. T. (2005). In pursuit of social betterment: A proposal to evaluate the Da Vinci learning model. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), theorists' models in action (pp. 47-64). New Directions in Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.151

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.151

King, J. A. (2005). A proposal to build evaluation capacity at the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Academy. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), theorists' models in action (pp. 85-98). New Directions in Evaluation, 106. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.153

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.153

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>