“Process Values” and “Deep Values” in Evaluation

Main Article Content

E. Jane Davidson

Abstract

Background: Many evaluation theorists and practitioners have advocated the application of cultural values to the evaluation process to ensure cultural appropriateness and responsiveness.


Purpose: This article draws a distinction between these “process values” and “deep values” in evaluation, using the specific example of cultural values to illustrate. The application of “deep values” refers to the deliberate and systematic inclusion of [in this case, cultural] values in the very definitions of “quality” and “value” used in an evaluation, and in the evaluative interpretation of evidence.


Setting: Not applicable.


Subjects: Not applicable.


Research Design: Not applicable.


Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.


Findings: Not applicable.


Conclusions: Including “deep cultural values” in the “merit determination” or “valuing” step in evaluation is partly about ensuring the right voices are at the sense-making table, but it’s also about having practical evaluation-specific methodologies for systematically and transparently building in those cultural values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Davidson, E. J. (2010). “Process Values” and “Deep Values” in Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i13.262
Section
Ideas to Consider in Evaluation

References

Durie, M. (2001, February). Address to the Hui Taumata Mātauranga (Māori Education Summit). Taupō, Aotearoa New Zealand.

Durie, M. (2003). Ngā Kāhui Pou: Launching Māori futures. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.

Wehipeihana, N. (2009, November). Evaluative quality assurance in indigenous contexts—challenges and opportunities. Presentation at the American Evaluation Association conference, Orlando, FL. Available online: http://tiny.cc/EQA

Most read articles by the same author(s)