What Does it Take to do Evaluation in Communities and Cultural Contexts Other Than Our Own?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This paper builds on the growing body of evaluation literature around the importance of culture and cultural context in evaluation (e.g. Greene, 2005; Hood, Hopson and Frierson 2005; Hopson, 2009; Kirkhart, 1995 and 2005; La France, 2001).
Purpose: The place of language, culture, cultural context, and leadership roles in evaluation is explored through consideration of the question, “What does it take to do evaluation in communities and cultural contexts other than our own?”
Setting: Not applicable.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: Not applicable.
Findings: Attention to the location of power and privilege in evaluation, and to community engagement and ‘sense-making’ processes are the conversational starting points to begin to explore what it takes to do evaluation in communities, where the language, culture, and cultural context are different from one’s own.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Hood, S., Hopson, R., & Frierson, H. (Eds.) (2005). The role of culture and cultural context in evaluation: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hopson, R. (2009). Reclaiming knowledge at the margins: Culturally Responsive Evaluation in the current evaluation moment. In Ryan, K, F., & Cousins, B, J. (Eds.). The Sage International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 429- 446). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226606.n24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226606.n24
Greene, J. (2005). Evaluators as stewards of the public good. In Hood, S., Hopson, R., & Frierson, H. (Eds.). The role of culture and cultural context in evaluation: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 87-104). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-783-120251003
Kirkhart, K. E. (2005). Through a cultural lens: Reflections on validity and theory in evaluation. In Hood, S., Hopson, R., & Frierson, H. (Eds.). The role of culture and cultural context in evaluation: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 21-39). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-783-120251004
Kirkhart, K. E. (1995). Seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road. Evaluation Practice, 16(1), 1- 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(95)90002-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(95)90002-0
LaFrance, J. (2001). Evaluation in Indian Country. In M. Thompson-Robinson, R. Hopson, & S. SenGupta, (Eds.), In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New Directions for Evaluation. (p. 39-50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Symonette, H. (2004). Walking pathways toward becoming a culturally competent evaluator: Boundaries, borderlands, and border crossings. In M. Thompson-Robinson, R. Hopson, & S. SenGupta, (Eds.), In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New Directions for Evaluation. (p. 95-109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.118
Wehipeihana, N. & McKegg, K. (2008). Indigenous Values: Adding value to evaluation practice. Paper presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society Conference: Perth, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0800800106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0800800106