A Job Analysis for K-8 Principals in a Nationwide Charter School System
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Although no single technique on its own can predict job performance, a job analysis is a customary approach for identifying the relevant knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAO) necessary to successfully complete the job tasks of a position. Once the position requirements are identified, the hiring process is faster and more effective because job candidates are evaluated on a common set of objective criteria.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a job analysis of the principal position for elementary and middle school public charter schools. Moreover, the final outcome of the job analysis was a linkage of KSAOs to their respective job tasks that could be used during the candidate selection process.
Setting: The job analysis was conducted in a national K-8 charter school system.
Subjects: The information collected during the job analysis came from six subject matter experts (SME) who were employed as a principal or as a supervisor of principals by the charter school system at the time of the study. The SMEs represented a balanced blend of perspectives of the principal position and they possessed a wealth of knowledge, job experience, and skill level that qualified them as experts of the principal position.
Intervention: During the job analysis, SMEs provided information about the principal position.
Research Design: The job analysis used a qualitative case study design with a convenience sample of SMEs.
Data Collection and Analysis: Subject matter experts participated in three phases of data collection. The first two phases collected information on the essential job tasks and the third phase collected information on the KSAOs required to successfully complete the job tasks.
Findings: In total, 314 essential job tasks were identified across 8 functional job categories. The job analysis condensed redundant job tasks and eliminated job tasks that were not endorsed by half of the SMEs, which totaled a final set of 84 essential job tasks. Then, SMEs rated the essential job tasks on several dimensions that were used to measure job task importance. Of the 84, 46 essential job tasks met the criterion of being the most important in terms of achieving organizational goals. A collaborative group that included the job analyst, principal recruiters and one SME identified the KSAOs necessary for completing the 46 essential job tasks. During the final phase of data collection, SMEs rated the KSAOs on the following dimensions: necessary for principal applicant to possess, practicality of finding a principal applicant with the KSAO, and consequence if KSAO is ignored in the selection process. Forty-nine of the 53 KSAOs met the inclusion criteria based on the ratings of the dimensions above.
Conclusions: The results from the job analysis revealed the diverse set of KSAOs required to successfully complete the essential job tasks of the principal position. Thus, using objective criteria established from the job analysis is a critical step in selecting the candidate who is best suited to succeed in the principal position.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Barnes, G., Crowe, E., & Schaefer, B. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five districts: A pilot study. Retrieved December 28, 2007 from http://www.nctaf.org/resources/demonstration_projects/turnover/documents/CTTFullReportfinal.pdf.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Brannick, M. T., & Levine, E. L. (2002). Job analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chen, P. Y., Carsten, J. M., & Krauss, A. D. (2003). Job analysis-The basis for developing criteria for all human resources programs. In J. E. Edwards, J. C. Scott, & N. S. Raju (eds.), The human resources program- evaluation handbook (pp. 27-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986199.n2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986199.n2
Coryn, C. L. S. (2007). Evaluation of researchers and their research: Toward making the implicit explicit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.
Coryn, C. L. S. (in press). Job analysis. In R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Sage glossary of the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dunnette, M. D. (1963). A modified model for test validation and selection research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 317-323.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047635
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470
Gottfredson, G., & Hybl, L. (1987). Research for elementary and middle schools: An analytical description of the school principal's job (Report no. 13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research & Improvement.
Hattie, J. A. (2005). What is the nature of evidence that makes a difference to student learning? Retrieved January 16, 2008 from http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/documents/Hattie.pdf
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). The validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72
Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior descriptions interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577-580.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.577
Jenkins, S. M., & Curtin, P. (2006). Adapting job analysis methodology to improve evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(4), 485-494.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006294303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006294303
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Latham, G., Saari, L., Purcell, G. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.65.4.422
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422
McCormick, E. J., Jeannerett, P. R., & Mechan, R. C. (1972). A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the position analysis questionnaire (PAC). Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 347-368.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033099
Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. C., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., Campion, M. A., Mayfield, M. S., Morgeson, F. P., Pearlman, K., Gowing, M. K., Lancaster, A. R., Silver, M. B., & Dye, D. M. (2001). Understanding work using the Occupational Information Network (O*Net): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 451-492.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00100.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00100.x
Salgado, J. F. (2001). Some landmarks of 100 years of scientific personnel selection at the beginning of the new century. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 3-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00159
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York, NY: Wiley.